i wont tell On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Simon Westlake < [email protected]> wrote:
> Btw, all this advice provided as is, I'm not an employee of Powercode etc > etc > On May 18, 2015 3:00 PM, "Simon Westlake" < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd just do 4.0.4 honestly, not much changed in it and it just fixes a >> couple off minor bugs. >> On May 18, 2015 2:57 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 4.0.2 is the latest non beta, any problems with that? >>> >>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:55 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> NX216v2 >>>> Im slowly onlining OSPF. I have one management subnet thats actually >>>> flowing with OSPF. im a baby steps guy when its a pre drunken passed out in >>>> bushes weekend week >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Go for it. If you're going to 4.x, I would recommend 4.17, which was >>>>> the last version in the 4.x series. >>>>> >>>>> But I have found that the 5.26 is a bit more robust in the OSPF >>>>> department. >>>>> >>>>> What hardware is this on BTW? >>>>> >>>>> bp >>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5/18/2015 12:48 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>>> >>>>> can I go 3.3.10 to 4.0.2? or do I need to load in order, and is >>>>> anything going to break >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Simon Westlake < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Update to the 4.x firmware line, it was fixed late in 3.x. >>>>>> On May 18, 2015 2:40 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Since I dont expect much forum followup from powercode >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Im trying to set my OSPF router ID IP as a loopback UP >>>>>>> I create the interface, but when I go to apply the IP is says cant >>>>>>> find dummy interface >>>>>>> >>>>>>> anybody come across this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>> team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
