yes there are. Eth3 for example has 36 local subnets that are customer facing on the network. 2 local /30 for the two remote OSPF routers beyond this interface, 12 /30 subnets for the backhaul access (each radio will be on a /30 with its connected router interface, this is just in prep, as the sites are isolated the subnets will move) and one local subnet to act as a gateway for a catch all DHCP relay
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there more than one subnet on your interfaces? I've found that if you > have other non-route type subnets on an interface, that they can mess with > the routed subnets. So you can remove/re-add those subnets that aren't used > for routing, and the routes will populate the way you need. > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > On 6/5/2015 11:53 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > So, I assume its a configuration issue, but the routers Im seeing this on > also have an old milan switch in front of them, that could be coming into > play, though I dont know how. > > If I reboot a switch between my mikrotik and my fortigates or > Imagestreams, the mikrotik shows it come back as a neighbor, but never > updates routes. The remote routers are acting like a woman, all nice until > you dont come home one night and the next day they make sure you see them, > wear little sexy outfits, but withhold the goods. > > I can powercycle the remote routers and everythign comes back up all > snazzy. I also can remove that network from the OSPF networks tab in the > mikrotik. > > It is configured using /30 between routers. The network type is set to > broadcast, someone told me it should be point to point, but I couldnt > easily get point to point option on the Fortigate OSPF configuration, so > this is the interim that worked until the network is all mikrotik, we have > 5 more of them that were supposed to be here wednesday. > > I configuered the ALL interface with the authentication key, then just > add the OSPF link networks in. > > I waited 5 minutes on one just to see if it was a dead interval type of > thing. > > I assume the problem here is a very simple misconfiguration on my part, > but my incompetence contract specifically states I can do stupid shit on a > whim. > > On another note, the authentication key is sent out over the network in > plain text? how viewable is this if its type broadcast? like can a customer > stick wireshark on his bridged subscriber and see it if theyre not on the > backbone of the network since I have all interfaces in this? > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your > team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
