If you go to the networks list and print, it will show the order. If the /30 you want to route through is not at the top of the list, then that will do it.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 6/5/2015 1:01 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
How do I know what order theyre in? Im currently in winbox and thats just sorted.

So what Im not understanding is why it initially works, but if a switch (or backhaul) in between drops, it shows the neighbor relationship, but never populates routes?

Im not questioning the advice, just trying to understand the underlying mechanics to avoid a similar fate in the future

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    That will do it. You want the routing subnet (the /30) to be first
    on the list. The other local subnets will get in the way.

    I've not had one with that many local subnets, usually just one or
    sometimes two. But if you delete and re-add the local subnets, it
    will put the /30 first, and you should be good to go.

    bp
    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

    On 6/5/2015 12:30 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
    yes there are. Eth3 for example has 36 local subnets that are
    customer facing on the network. 2 local /30 for the two remote
    OSPF routers beyond this interface, 12 /30 subnets for the
    backhaul access (each radio will be on a /30 with its connected
    router interface, this is just in prep, as the sites are isolated
    the subnets will move) and one local subnet to act as a gateway
    for a catch all DHCP relay

    On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Is there more than one subnet on your interfaces? I've found
        that if you have other non-route type subnets on an
        interface, that they can mess with the routed subnets. So you
        can remove/re-add those subnets that aren't used for routing,
        and the routes will populate the way you need.

        bp
        <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

        On 6/5/2015 11:53 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
        So, I assume its a configuration issue, but the routers Im
        seeing this on also have an old milan switch in front of
        them, that could be coming into play, though I dont know how.

        If I reboot a switch between my mikrotik and my fortigates
        or Imagestreams, the mikrotik shows it come back as a
        neighbor, but never updates routes. The remote routers are
        acting like a woman, all nice until you dont come home one
        night and the next day they make sure you see them, wear
        little sexy outfits, but withhold the goods.

        I can powercycle the remote routers and everythign comes
        back up all snazzy. I also can remove that network from the
        OSPF networks tab in the mikrotik.

        It is configured using /30 between routers. The network type
        is set to broadcast, someone told me it should be point to
        point, but I couldnt easily get point to point option on the
        Fortigate OSPF configuration, so this is the interim that
        worked until the network is all mikrotik, we have 5 more of
        them that were supposed to be here wednesday.

        I configuered the ALL interface with the authentication key,
        then just add the OSPF link networks in.

        I waited 5 minutes on one just to see if it was a dead
        interval type of thing.

        I assume the problem here is a very simple misconfiguration
        on my part, but my incompetence contract specifically states
        I can do stupid shit on a whim.

        On another note, the authentication key is sent out over the
        network in plain text? how viewable is this if its type
        broadcast? like can a customer stick wireshark on his
        bridged subscriber and see it if theyre not on the backbone
        of the network since I have all interfaces in this?
-- If you only see yourself as part of the team but
        you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already
        failed as part of the team.




-- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
    your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
    the team.




--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to