With my configuration this would be expected maybe then since two ports on the router go into the same switch?
I had a second port connected while preparing to isolate a a backhaul. I isolated the backhaul and got to a single port again, but plugged in another for testing something else On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Shayne Lebrun <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope. That generally means your router is sending out an ospf ‘hello!’ > packet, and is getting it back. I.e. bridge loop. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Friday, June 5, 2015 4:04 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OSPF doesnt repopulate if link drops > > > > In the log I see this. I was told unless you know what youre looking at > that OSPF logging is confusing. Is this normal to be seeing? > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:01 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > > How do I know what order theyre in? Im currently in winbox and thats just > sorted. > > > > So what Im not understanding is why it initially works, but if a switch > (or backhaul) in between drops, it shows the neighbor relationship, but > never populates routes? > > > > Im not questioning the advice, just trying to understand the underlying > mechanics to avoid a similar fate in the future > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > > That will do it. You want the routing subnet (the /30) to be first on the > list. The other local subnets will get in the way. > > I've not had one with that many local subnets, usually just one or > sometimes two. But if you delete and re-add the local subnets, it will put > the /30 first, and you should be good to go. > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 6/5/2015 12:30 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > yes there are. Eth3 for example has 36 local subnets that are customer > facing on the network. 2 local /30 for the two remote OSPF routers beyond > this interface, 12 /30 subnets for the backhaul access (each radio will be > on a /30 with its connected router interface, this is just in prep, as the > sites are isolated the subnets will move) and one local subnet to act as a > gateway for a catch all DHCP relay > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there more than one subnet on your interfaces? I've found that if you > have other non-route type subnets on an interface, that they can mess with > the routed subnets. So you can remove/re-add those subnets that aren't used > for routing, and the routes will populate the way you need. > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 6/5/2015 11:53 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > So, I assume its a configuration issue, but the routers Im seeing this on > also have an old milan switch in front of them, that could be coming into > play, though I dont know how. > > > > If I reboot a switch between my mikrotik and my fortigates or > Imagestreams, the mikrotik shows it come back as a neighbor, but never > updates routes. The remote routers are acting like a woman, all nice until > you dont come home one night and the next day they make sure you see them, > wear little sexy outfits, but withhold the goods. > > > I can powercycle the remote routers and everythign comes back up all > snazzy. I also can remove that network from the OSPF networks tab in the > mikrotik. > > > > It is configured using /30 between routers. The network type is set to > broadcast, someone told me it should be point to point, but I couldnt > easily get point to point option on the Fortigate OSPF configuration, so > this is the interim that worked until the network is all mikrotik, we have > 5 more of them that were supposed to be here wednesday. > > > > I configuered the ALL interface with the authentication key, then just add > the OSPF link networks in. > > > > I waited 5 minutes on one just to see if it was a dead interval type of > thing. > > > > I assume the problem here is a very simple misconfiguration on my part, > but my incompetence contract specifically states I can do stupid shit on a > whim. > > > > On another note, the authentication key is sent out over the network in > plain text? how viewable is this if its type broadcast? like can a customer > stick wireshark on his bridged subscriber and see it if theyre not on the > backbone of the network since I have all interfaces in this? > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
