EPTP mode fills the latency fix. My first attempt at AF5x and it won't even register. I'm trying to replace Rockets that link up at -66. I'm told that there's a path issue or bad radio.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 11, 2015 7:45 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > Why exactly? Just asking. I'm wondering if we should be doing cheap PTP > with ePMP or AF5x. I have several Force110 links up (just SMs, not PTP) > operating all across the 5GHz bands. And one 10 mile link with Laird 2' > dishes using connectorized non-GPS radios. Other than some oddities like > intermittent increases in latency, they have all been working very well. > Most are still running 2.3.3 and I don't want to touch them because they're > working just fine. I'm leaning towards the Force110 PTP radios and whatever > antennas required for new links since it fits with all the other Canopy and > ePMP stuff (power injection, etc). But the AFs sure are nice when you can > do FDD (except the 5X!) and get very low latency like licensed. > > On 6/11/2015 6:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Honestly I think they're better than AF5x at this point. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jun 11, 2015 7:25 PM, "joseph marsh" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I got 2 links ready to deploy just sitting the office waiting to go up >> on the tower >> On Jun 11, 2015 5:34 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Uhm...I guess? It hears noise better than Ubnt for sure. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Jun 11, 2015 6:23 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Does the force auto select a clean frequency? >>>> On Jun 11, 2015 5:13 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> containerized... that must be when you buy a cheap router from walmart >>>>> in put it on a tower in a rubbermaid container. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You mean connectorized? >>>>>> >>>>>> bp >>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/11/2015 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The containerized 5 GHz radios do the same throughput >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >
