Yes, but I would go with a more traditional case and panel approach. Our customer don't really care about industrial design. Price has to make sense. Maybe have the Epmp department help with that one..
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 15, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Matt Mangriotis > <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > > If I were to say that there would be a 12” square flat panel (think about the > PMP 450i integrated SM tilted at a 45 degree) for 3.65 GHz available, would > there be strong interest in this from this crowd? > > It would be somewhat more expensive, but would have an integrated 19 dBi flat > panel antenna, and the PMP 450i rear housing (but contain the existing 450 SM > PCB). > > Matt > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 1:41 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i > > We put up a 3.65 connectorized SM with a tan Mars 15x15 panel oriented like a > diamond, on some customer’s upscale house that was the exact same color. He > was very happy. I just hope he doesn’t tell all his neighbors and they want > it too, because it was really too expensive by the time you add up the > premium for 3.65 + the premium for connectorized SM + a fairly expensive > panel antenna. Also the pigtails just reached, but Cambium is working on > that. > > So an integrated panel would be nice. Although the 3.65 bare SMs work > amazingly well at 1-2 miles. > > > From: George Skorup > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 12:46 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i > > The throughput issues with both bridge mode and especially NAT mode was > resolved with 13.2. I think Aaron posted some screenshots while they were > working on it. If your linktest gets you say 60x20Mbps, you can get very > close to that in bridge mode, NAT mode is slightly less, but it's not as bad > as it used to be (was about 10Mbps!). > > We will probably move to the 450d SM for 5GHz and do away with reflectors and > Stingers (sorry Chuck). We are also not doing any more 2.4GHz. We have a > single sector up with about 25 SMs on it and it works fine for the most part, > but the noise is horrible. And all I want for 3GHz is an integrated panel SM. > > On 7/15/2015 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > Yeah they max out way before the AP does...30meg might be right....but we're > not usually selling more than that to one customer. > > There's room in the market for a higher end SM for sure. > > On 7/15/2015 11:22 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Higher peak Tx power also brings about higher Tx power at max modulation. Tx > power at lowest modulation doesn't mean much to me. > > Weren't there complains that the 450 SMs were running out of steam at like 30 > megabit? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > From: "Adam Moffett" mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 10:13:04 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i > > I can also see why you wouldn't do it. > 450d can max out the (FCC) legal EIRP with the available tx power. The > higher pps, faster processor, etc are features more useful for an AP. Maybe > they keep the cost down a little by NOT doing more with that one. > > Or phrased another way, maybe 450di would be the ideal CPE except nobody > would buy it because the 450d was cheaper. > > ....just speculation. > > > On 7/15/2015 10:58 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > *nods* The press release prompted the question. > > It seems like a 450di would be the ideal 450 CPE. ;-) > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > From: "Matt Mangriotis" mailto:matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:55:06 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i > > These are two different products, addressing different markets. Cambium is > hard at work getting new products released at an increased rate, all with the > goal of providing solutions to help you guys build your businesses… > > Check out the Press Release and additional information on the 450i, which was > just released this morning: > > http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/pressreleases > > Feel free to ask questions about it here, or on our forum site also: > > http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/Introducing-Cambium-450i-PMP-and-PTP/m-p/42199#U42199 > > Matt > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:33 AM > To: Animal Farm mailto:af@afmug.com > Subject: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i > > Am I correct in that these two products were developed independently of each > others' advancements? the 450d is just a regular 450 feature set in a dish > form factor and the 450i is all of the new capabilities, but in the > traditional form factors? > > > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > > > > >
