You mean you want to see some test results where in-band, but off
channel noise hurts a competitor, but doesn't hurt the 450i? So would I.
On 7/15/2015 3:32 PM, Peter Kranz wrote:
This sounds good.. but you guys should show us the numbers on both
claims.. Jideally PMP450 vs PMP450i vs EPMP and for extra credit
RocketM5-AC and M5-AC-Lite.
*Peter Kranz
*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-0000
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Matt Mangriotis
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 12:24 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i
We’re employing what we’re calling Dynamic Interference Filtering in
this platform… this is actually circuitry that “wraps around” the
selected operating channel, effectively isolation noise from all other
frequencies. Once you change channels, this filter moves with it.
Because this is an ultrawide band (supporting 4900-5925 MHz), we think
this filtering will really help mitigate “off channel” but “in band”
noise.
Because this product utilized a newer generation FPGA (actually a
SoC), we have much more processing power available. At release, we’re
over three times more PPS than the PMP 450, and there’s room to grow.
Headline throughput is the same as PMP 450 today, but you will see
differences (improvements) with smaller packet traffic, when NAT is
on, etc. We will also have improvements to headline throughput coming
in future releases.
Matt
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 1:55 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i
Would like to see more information about the 450i interference
mitigation advances over the 450.. and PPS/Throughput improvements
over the 450.
*Peter Kranz
*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-0000
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
