We will work some acceptable solution. Because lots of new features get added in 13.4(refer Release Notes) hence the code size get increased and we ran short of DRAM.
Thanks, Chitrang Srivastava Cambium Networks ________________________________________ From: Bill Prince <[email protected]> Sent: 16 July 2015 22:19:52 To: [email protected]; Chitrang Srivastava; Jonathan Mandziara Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Software 13.4: P8 FSK not recommended That fixes it. If the subscriber uses a router, and it is on the DMZ, then that could work (you get zero entries in the NAT table). However, if they are bridging through to the SM, then it probably won't be useable. A couple of Macs bridged will eat >1024 connections in no time. A lot of Apple software has the nasty habit of never closing a connection, so the NAT table fills up in no time. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 7/15/2015 7:04 PM, Chitrang Srivastava wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Please reduce the NAT table size from Configuration - >NAT, to 1024 and try > it out. > > Thanks, > Chitrang Srivastava > Cambium Networks > > ________________________________________ > From: Chitrang Srivastava > Sent: 15 July 2015 07:38:49 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Software 13.4: P8 FSK not recommended > > Hi Bill, > > In order to investigate P8 issue, please do following, > > AFTER upgrade to P8 and applying configuration changes but BEFORE doing > reboot, take out engineering.cgi. > Please also send configuration file as well from Configuration - > Unit > Setting. > > Does without NAT P8 is accessible? > If the above steps didn't work ( actually they should because most of our > configuration changes applies on next reboot) they please send screen shot > of NAT configuration page before you press Save Changes. > > Thanks, > Chitrang Srivastava > Cambium Networks > > ________________________________________ > From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Bill Prince <[email protected]> > Sent: 15 July 2015 05:35:23 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Software 13.4: P8 FSK not recommended > > Nope. Have already loaded 13.4 on P9, P10, and P11, and all is good with > them. > > Have also loaded 13.4 on PMP430 and PMP450. > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 7/14/2015 4:59 PM, George Skorup wrote: >> I wonder if this affects P9 boards as well? That would suck. Not sure >> if I have one around the office to test.
