What's the max PTP speed using 20mhz channel with EPMP? Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 9, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Lot more bandwidth? I don't think so... > > If there is noise I'm almost certain the epmp would win. Look at my first > case with them - Ubnt couldn't exceed 5 megs aggregate where epmp gets me 50+ > in the same frequency and physical spot. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > >> On Aug 9, 2015 8:08 AM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected]> wrote: >> What is the appeal of using ePTP vs. a Mikrotik (or UBNT) AC product with a >> lot more BW in the same channel size? >> >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Craig House >> Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:03 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> >> >> EPTP >> >> >> >> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 4:53:35 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> >> >> Tdd ptp or eptp? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Aug 8, 2015 5:37 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have a pair of unsynced 5Ghz on Force dishes that I put up in April. They >> run pretty much flawlessly. They are 4 miles apart and push around 80mb >> each way in a 20mhz channel. No complaints. Other than the crappy design >> of the dish which I would have tossed off the tower when I was installing it >> if I had an alternative. >> >> >> >> Craig >> >> >> >> >> >> From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> >> To: "af" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 3:50:51 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> >> >> +1 about. >> >> >> >> So I assume we'll see about half the current latency with 2.5 msec? I can >> live with that for most links. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the confirmation. And on a Saturday!!! >> >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Dan Sullivan >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 2.5 msec frame allows for sync and improves PTP latency as compared to 5 >> msec frame. >> >> >> >> ePTP cannot be synced as communication is driven based on dynamic data from >> each link. >> >> >> Dan Sullivan >> >> ePMP Software Manager >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard >> Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 10:11 AM >> To: af >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> >> >> Yep, I'm pretty sure it doesn't use fixed frames in ePTP mode... trying to >> sync that sounds like it'd end up like airmax sync. >> >> 2.5ms frames make sync a lot more useful for ptp though. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> But that depends on frame timing which would leave you at the current tdd >> ptp (5ms today, 2.5ms after 2.5). I'd love to see the 2ms latency be synced >> but I don't see how that would be doable. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Aug 8, 2015 7:54 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No, I mean exactly what I said ePTP sync. >> >> There's no reason that I'm aware of that the ePTP up\down cycles couldn't be >> synced. The regular sync has to deal with potentially dozens of clients. The >> ePTP just has to deal with one. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> >> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:48:14 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> Eptp sync doesn't sound possible. That's what the tdd ptp is for. Do you >> mean the 2.5ms timing? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Aug 8, 2015 7:47 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Though* Early in the morning... >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> >> From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:45:55 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> Is it, thought? ;-) >> >> >> FWIW, I have some ePTP up (eagerly awaiting ePTP sync!) and no issues that >> I'm aware of. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> >> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 4:41:45 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> How long has it been up? According to Cambium I'm the only one that's been >> experiencing a bug and it's all over the place. They've got a fix for it >> but it's just so weird that I'm the only one with the problem =/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yep, I just replaced a pair of NanoBridges with Force 110's doing ePTP a >> couple days ago and we have at least one other. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Anyone at all? >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373
