I think he's trying to power everything with the poe switch.
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > why not just have one router port for the BH and one router port for the > AP? Are you trying to preserve layer 2 access to the AP in the case of > router failure or something? > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Jeremy <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> I would say trunk port to the router and then breakout vlans on each port >> in the switch. >> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, TJ Trout <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> So say I have a 12port wisp switch and on that site my backhaul is from >>> a airfiber and my access point is a rocket, what is the best/easiest way to >>> setup a vlan to accomplish this? >>> >>> There is two ways I think, >>> >>> Method 1 would use 4 total ports on the wisp switch, 1 for the AF POE >>> out and another to the router WAN, another for the rocket POE and a forth >>> to the lan side of the router, advantage simple setup? Full throughput, >>> disadvantage you take 4 ports. >>> >>> Method 2 would use 3 total ports on the wisp switch, 1 for AF, 1 for >>> rocket and 1 trunk port to the router, the trunk port goes between the >>> switch and router with 2 vlans, VLAN 100 for example would be wan to the AF >>> and VLAN 200 would be lan to the rocket, advantage would be less utilized >>> ports disadvantage would be sharing throughput on the single port (which >>> won't be a problem in my scenario) >>> >>> Could someone give me a few hints on which one is better and maybe a >>> hint so I can try to configure it myself? >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
