I ended up dedicating a port for the Wan instead of trunking the Wan and lan on the same port because it was easier. when I need that port back I'll figure out how to do trunking. man the wisp switch was easy to vlan though, never did a single vlan before and I figured it out in 1 minute. On Aug 18, 2015 11:05 AM, "Sean Heskett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think he's trying to power everything with the poe switch. > > > > On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> why not just have one router port for the BH and one router port for the >> AP? Are you trying to preserve layer 2 access to the AP in the case of >> router failure or something? >> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I would say trunk port to the router and then breakout vlans on each >>> port in the switch. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> So say I have a 12port wisp switch and on that site my backhaul is from >>>> a airfiber and my access point is a rocket, what is the best/easiest way to >>>> setup a vlan to accomplish this? >>>> >>>> There is two ways I think, >>>> >>>> Method 1 would use 4 total ports on the wisp switch, 1 for the AF POE >>>> out and another to the router WAN, another for the rocket POE and a forth >>>> to the lan side of the router, advantage simple setup? Full throughput, >>>> disadvantage you take 4 ports. >>>> >>>> Method 2 would use 3 total ports on the wisp switch, 1 for AF, 1 for >>>> rocket and 1 trunk port to the router, the trunk port goes between the >>>> switch and router with 2 vlans, VLAN 100 for example would be wan to the AF >>>> and VLAN 200 would be lan to the rocket, advantage would be less utilized >>>> ports disadvantage would be sharing throughput on the single port (which >>>> won't be a problem in my scenario) >>>> >>>> Could someone give me a few hints on which one is better and maybe a >>>> hint so I can try to configure it myself? >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >
