the remote router at the other end would have a different site id necessitating a different third octet than in this scheme, it wont work
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Tim Reichhart < [email protected]> wrote: > Mike > basically rob haas was helping me out on this he sent me an little cheat > sheet like this: > > > a /29 – 255.255.255.248 is what I use on the backhauls > > Each Site is assign a site number – say 33 > > Every site is assigned a /24 for management with my IP scheme of > 10.100.site.X > > The first backhauls would fall into 10.100.33.0/29 so: > > 10.100.33.1 – Local radio > > 10.100.33.2 – Local Router > > 10.100.33.3 – Remote Radio > > 10.100.33.4 – Remote Router > > > > The next backhaul would be out of 10.100.33.8/29 so: > > 10.100.33.9 – Local Radio > > 10.100.33.10 – Local Router > > 10.100.33.11 – Remote Radio > > 10.100.33.12 – Remote Router > > > basically I want break down the ip's down for backhauls. > > > Tim > > ------------------------------ > -----Original Message----- > From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 08/26/15 01:23 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > Can you tell us the bigger picture of what's going on so we can help > better? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:09:01 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > I was told to take that /24 and break it down to /29. But I didn't see an > way to make work without readdressing whole subnet. > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 2015/08/26 18:59:54 > > I did not, no. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:58:27 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > Did you mean a /29 on eth1? > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373On Aug 26, 2015 12:53 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > You can't have overlapping subnets. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > From: "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:52:43 AM > Subject: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > Hi guys > I am having bit of an issue getting /29 to work in routerboard. What I am > looking to do is put 172.16.2.x/29 on ether2 but I already have > 172.16.2.1/24on ether1. So I don't know what I am missing here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
