Guys
I think I will just leave it as is Sorry for wasting you guys time on this 
issue.

Thanks Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 08/26/15 02:02 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard

How much can you really believe networking advice from an attorney?   ;-)




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
 

 From: "Douglas A. Hass" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:59:51 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard



 
Back to your original question, though-you would have to renumber if you're 
already using a /24 on an interface and now want to carve that particular /24 
up in /29s.
 
But if you're using private IP space, why limit yourself to /29s everywhere?  
Particularly if each site would have a site number, you could easily do:
 
Site 33:
 
10.100.33.0/24  (.1 local radio, .2 local router, .101 remote radio, .102 
remote router)
 
Site 34:
 
10.100.34.0/24  (.1 local radio, .2 local router, .101 remote radio, .102 
remote router)
 
And so on…
 
Leave yourself plenty of room and route bigger subnets.  The site numbering 
idea might end up a little confusing, though, since "Site 33" is really TWO 
physical sites, and "Site 34" in my example above is TWO physical sites, one of 
which you've already called part of Site 33.
 
Doug
 
 
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard
 
Mike
basically rob haas was helping me out on this he sent me an little cheat sheet 
like this:
 
a /29 - 255.255.255.248 is what I use on the backhauls
Each Site is assign a site number - say 33
Every site is assigned a /24 for management with my IP scheme of 10.100.site.X
The first backhauls would fall into 10.100.33.0/29 so:
10.100.33.1 - Local radio
10.100.33.2 - Local Router
10.100.33.3 - Remote Radio
10.100.33.4 - Remote Router
 
The next backhaul would be out of 10.100.33.8/29 so:
10.100.33.9 - Local Radio
10.100.33.10 - Local Router
10.100.33.11 - Remote Radio
10.100.33.12 - Remote Router
 
basically I want break down the ip's down for backhauls.
 
Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 08/26/15 01:23 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard
Can you tell us the bigger picture of what's going on so we can help better?


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
 
 


 From: "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:09:01 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard


I was told to take that /24 and break it down to /29. But I didn't see an way 
to make work without readdressing whole subnet.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard
From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 2015/08/26 18:59:54

I did not, no.




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
 

 From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:58:27 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard


Did you mean a /29 on eth1?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373On Aug 26, 2015 12:53 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:

You can't have overlapping subnets.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
 

 From: "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:52:43 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard

Hi guys
I am having bit of an issue getting /29 to work in routerboard. What I am 
looking to do is put 172.16.2.x/29 on ether2 but I already have 172.16.2.1/24on 
ether1. So I don't know what I am missing here.

 
 
 
 
 


 

  
 
 

Douglas A. Hass
Associate
312.786.6502
[email protected]

Franczek Radelet P.C.

300 South Wacker Drive
Suite 3400
Chicago, IL 60606
312.986.0300 - Main
312.986.9192 - Fax
www.franczek.com
www.wagehourinsights.com
Connect with me:

 
 
Circular 230 Disclosure: Under requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue 
Service, we inform you that, unless specifically stated otherwise, any federal 
tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not 
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of (i) 
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing 
or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter herein.
For more information about Franczek Radelet P.C., please visit franczek.com. 
The information contained in this e-mail message or any attachment may be 
confidential and/or privileged, and is intended only for the use of the named 
recipient. If you are not the named recipient of this message, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or 
any attachment thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Franczek Radelet is committed to sustainability - please consider the 
environment before printing this email 
 




Reply via email to