Ya I was going to say is anyone else freaked out the lawyer knows subnetting?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > How much can you really believe networking advice from an attorney? ;-) > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Douglas A. Hass" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:59:51 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > > Back to your original question, though—you would have to renumber if > you’re already using a /24 on an interface and now want to carve *that > particular* /24 up in /29s. > > > > But if you’re using private IP space, why limit yourself to /29s > everywhere? Particularly if each site would have a site number, you could > easily do: > > > > Site 33: > > > > 10.100.33.0/24 (.1 local radio, .2 local router, .101 remote radio, .102 > remote router) > > > > Site 34: > > > > 10.100.34.0/24 (.1 local radio, .2 local router, .101 remote radio, .102 > remote router) > > > > And so on… > > > > Leave yourself plenty of room and route bigger subnets. The site > numbering idea might end up a little confusing, though, since “Site 33” is > really TWO physical sites, and “Site 34” in my example above is TWO > physical sites, one of which you’ve already called part of Site 33. > > > > Doug > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tim Reichhart > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:32 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > > Mike > basically rob haas was helping me out on this he sent me an little cheat > sheet like this: > > > > a /29 – 255.255.255.248 is what I use on the backhauls > > Each Site is assign a site number – say 33 > > Every site is assigned a /24 for management with my IP scheme of > 10.100.site.X > > The first backhauls would fall into 10.100.33.0/29 so: > > 10.100.33.1 – Local radio > > 10.100.33.2 – Local Router > > 10.100.33.3 – Remote Radio > > 10.100.33.4 – Remote Router > > > > The next backhaul would be out of 10.100.33.8/29 so: > > 10.100.33.9 – Local Radio > > 10.100.33.10 – Local Router > > 10.100.33.11 – Remote Radio > > 10.100.33.12 – Remote Router > > > > basically I want break down the ip's down for backhauls. > > > > Tim > > ------------------------------ > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 08/26/15 01:23 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > Can you tell us the bigger picture of what's going on so we can help > better? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:09:01 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > I was told to take that /24 and break it down to /29. But I didn't see an > way to make work without readdressing whole subnet. > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 2015/08/26 18:59:54 > > I did not, no. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:58:27 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > Did you mean a /29 on eth1? > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373On Aug 26, 2015 12:53 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > You can't have overlapping subnets. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > From: "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:52:43 AM > Subject: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > Hi guys > I am having bit of an issue getting /29 to work in routerboard. What I am > looking to do is put 172.16.2.x/29 on ether2 but I already have > 172.16.2.1/24on ether1. So I don't know what I am missing here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Douglas A. Hass* > Associate > 312.786.6502 > [email protected] > > *Franczek Radelet P.C.* > > 300 South Wacker Drive > Suite 3400 > Chicago, IL 60606 > 312.986.0300 - Main > 312.986.9192 - Fax > www.franczek.com > www.wagehourinsights.com > Connect with me: > [image: linkedin] <http://linkedin.com/in/douglashass>[image: twitter] > <https://twitter.com/WageHourInsight> > *Circular 230 Disclosure: Under requirements imposed by the Internal > Revenue Service, we inform you that, unless specifically stated otherwise, > any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any > attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for > the purposes of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or > (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction > or tax-related matter herein. * > ------------------------------ > For more information about Franczek Radelet P.C., please visit > franczek.com. The information contained in this e-mail message or any > attachment may be confidential and/or privileged, and is intended only for > the use of the named recipient. If you are not the named recipient of this > message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or > copying of this message or any attachment thereto, is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and > delete all copies. > ------------------------------ > *Franczek Radelet is committed to sustainability - please consider the > environment before printing this email* > >
