It's because of your generation of wasting IPs we have a shortage now =P
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Hass, Douglas A. <d...@franczek.com> wrote: > Oh, yes. The whole /16. J Gotta love how IP addresses got handed out > back in the good ol’ days… > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Baird > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 1:38 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > > An entire 'Class B'? A /16? > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hass, Douglas A. <d...@franczek.com> > wrote: > > Sure—but in the middle of the night, the last thing I wanted to do was > fire up a second system to crack the code for my IP numbering. If I knew > that site 30 was down, I could go right to it. It can’t be avoided > sometimes with public IPs, for sure (though I was lucky and had an entire > public Class B to work with, so I even did it with my public IPs). > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 1:22 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > > That's what IPPlan etc is for. Or Excel > spreadsheet/Powercode/Dude/Wispmon/etc > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Hass, Douglas A. <d...@franczek.com> > wrote: > > Exactly. The site ID piece gets confusing if you try to number by > backhaul. I think it makes more sense to assign subnets by physical > location. > > > > Tower site 1: 10.100.1.x/24 > > Tower site 20: 10.100.20.x/24 > > Tower site 30: 10.100.30.x/24 > > > > And so forth. This still lets you do something consistent like this: > > > > Tower site 1—Tower site 20 backhaul: > > > > 10.100.1.21/24 – local radio > > 10.100.1.22/24 – local router interface > > 10.100.20.1/24 – remote radio > > 10.100.20.2/24 – remote router interface > > > > Tower 1—Tower site 30 backhaul > > > > 10.100.1.31/24 – local radio > > 10.100.1.32/24 – local router interface > > 10.100.30.1/24 – remote radio > > 10.100.30.2/24 – remote router interface > > > > The biggest problem I had with using /30s was that unless I set up DNS, I > lost track of what /30 belonged to what site once I had more than a handful > of backhauls. Numbering this way, without DNS, all I have to know is what > the site ID is. > > > > Doug > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 1:03 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > > Site 33: > > > > 10.100.33.0/24 (.1 local radio, .2 local router, .101 remote radio, .102 > remote router) > > > > Site 34: > > > > 10.100.34.0/24 (.1 local radio, .2 local router, .101 remote radio, .102 > remote router) > > > > > > If these are talking to one another with this scheme, the routers may be > able to have multiple IPs but very few radios allow multiple IPs on the > device > > > > Site 33 local radio is 10.100.33.1 to site 33, but that same radio to site > 34 would be 10.100.34.101 > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Hass, Douglas A. <d...@franczek.com> > wrote: > > > > Back to your original question, though—you would have to renumber if > you’re already using a /24 on an interface and now want to carve *that > particular* /24 up in /29s. > > > > But if you’re using private IP space, why limit yourself to /29s > everywhere? Particularly if each site would have a site number, you could > easily do: > > > > Site 33: > > > > 10.100.33.0/24 (.1 local radio, .2 local router, .101 remote radio, .102 > remote router) > > > > Site 34: > > > > 10.100.34.0/24 (.1 local radio, .2 local router, .101 remote radio, .102 > remote router) > > > > And so on… > > > > Leave yourself plenty of room and route bigger subnets. The site > numbering idea might end up a little confusing, though, since “Site 33” is > really TWO physical sites, and “Site 34” in my example above is TWO > physical sites, one of which you’ve already called part of Site 33. > > > > Doug > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Tim Reichhart > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:32 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > > Mike > > > basically rob haas was helping me out on this he sent me an little cheat > sheet like this: > > > > a /29 – 255.255.255.248 is what I use on the backhauls > > Each Site is assign a site number – say 33 > > Every site is assigned a /24 for management with my IP scheme of > 10.100.site.X > > The first backhauls would fall into 10.100.33.0/29 so: > > 10.100.33.1 – Local radio > > 10.100.33.2 – Local Router > > 10.100.33.3 – Remote Radio > > 10.100.33.4 – Remote Router > > > > The next backhaul would be out of 10.100.33.8/29 so: > > 10.100.33.9 – Local Radio > > 10.100.33.10 – Local Router > > 10.100.33.11 – Remote Radio > > 10.100.33.12 – Remote Router > > > > basically I want break down the ip's down for backhauls. > > > > Tim > > ------------------------------ > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Date: 08/26/15 01:23 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > Can you tell us the bigger picture of what's going on so we can help > better? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* "Tim Reichhart" <timreichh...@hometowncable.net> > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 26, 2015 12:09:01 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > I was told to take that /24 and break it down to /29. But I didn't see an > way to make work without readdressing whole subnet. > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Date: 2015/08/26 18:59:54 > > I did not, no. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:58:27 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > > Did you mean a /29 on eth1? > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373On Aug 26, 2015 12:53 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> > wrote: > > You can't have overlapping subnets. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > From: "Tim Reichhart" <timreichh...@hometowncable.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 11:52:43 AM > Subject: [AFMUG] Issues with doing /29 inside of routerboard > > Hi guys > I am having bit of an issue getting /29 to work in routerboard. What I am > looking to do is put 172.16.2.x/29 on ether2 but I already have > 172.16.2.1/24on ether1. So I don't know what I am missing here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Douglas A. Hass* > Associate > 312.786.6502 > d...@franczek.com > > *Franczek Radelet P.C.* > > 300 South Wacker Drive > Suite 3400 > Chicago, IL 60606 > 312.986.0300 - Main > 312.986.9192 - Fax > www.franczek.com > www.wagehourinsights.com > Connect with me: > > [image: linkedin] <http://linkedin.com/in/douglashass> > > > > [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/WageHourInsight> > > > *Circular 230 Disclosure: Under requirements imposed by the Internal > Revenue Service, we inform you that, unless specifically stated otherwise, > any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any > attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for > the purposes of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or > (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction > or tax-related matter herein. * > ------------------------------ > > For more information about Franczek Radelet P.C., please visit > franczek.com. The information contained in this e-mail message or any > attachment may be confidential and/or privileged, and is intended only for > the use of the named recipient. If you are not the named recipient of this > message, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or > copying of this message or any attachment thereto, is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and > delete all copies. > ------------------------------ > > *Franczek Radelet is committed to sustainability - please consider the > environment before printing this email* > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > >
