Same here, it's been working great. It's worth noting that they're a little light on processing power since they're designed to take advantage of the switch chips.
On Friday, September 4, 2015, Mark - Myakka Technologies <[email protected]> wrote: > Forrest, > > I've been using the 24 port CRS rackmount for at 18 months at our > office. Haven't had a problem with it. Doing basic firewall, DHCP, > NAT and a few VLANS. No issues. > > -- > Best regards, > Mark mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;> > > Myakka Technologies, Inc. > www.MyakkaTech.com > > Proud Sponsor of the Myakka City Relay For Life > http://www.RelayForLife.org/MyakkaCityFL > > Please Donate at Please Donate at http://www.myakkatech.com/RFL.html > ------ > > Friday, September 4, 2015, 6:37:47 PM, you wrote: > > FCLA> So, I am currently using a RB2011 w/wireless as my 'edge > FCLA> device' here at packetflux.ￜￜ I seem to need more gigabit ports > FCLA> for devices than it provides, and I also would like to repurpose > FCLA> it as a wifi booster in the end of the house where the rb2011 > FCLA> doesn't reach well. > > > FCLA> So I'm looking at swapping it for a bigger 'tik. > > > FCLA> Is there anything 'different' about these CRS products > FCLA> that I need to know about?ￜ I'm looking at the 24 port one with > FCLA> built in AP...ￜ > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > >
