Or you can wait for the mythical RB3011. SOON! From: George Skorup Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 7:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CRS125-24G-1S-2HnD-IN
I get better performance from the CRS125 compared to the RB493G. It's also the same CPU as the RB2011, so I don't think Forrest will see any difference in performance. I wouldn't expect any range increase on the wireless compared to the 2011. But all those gigabit ports! I've noticed the LCD sucks up about 10% CPU because it's polling all of the interface stats in the background. That's with zero configuration on it. Turn the LCD stuff off and it sits at 0%. On 9/4/2015 7:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: Same here, it's been working great. It's worth noting that they're a little light on processing power since they're designed to take advantage of the switch chips. On Friday, September 4, 2015, Mark - Myakka Technologies <[email protected]> wrote: Forrest, I've been using the 24 port CRS rackmount for at 18 months at our office. Haven't had a problem with it. Doing basic firewall, DHCP, NAT and a few VLANS. No issues. -- Best regards, Mark mailto:[email protected] Myakka Technologies, Inc. www.MyakkaTech.com Proud Sponsor of the Myakka City Relay For Life http://www.RelayForLife.org/MyakkaCityFL Please Donate at Please Donate at http://www.myakkatech.com/RFL.html ------ Friday, September 4, 2015, 6:37:47 PM, you wrote: FCLA> So, I am currently using a RB2011 w/wireless as my 'edge FCLA> device' here at packetflux.ￜￜ I seem to need more gigabit ports FCLA> for devices than it provides, and I also would like to repurpose FCLA> it as a wifi booster in the end of the house where the rb2011 FCLA> doesn't reach well. FCLA> So I'm looking at swapping it for a bigger 'tik. FCLA> Is there anything 'different' about these CRS products FCLA> that I need to know about?ￜ I'm looking at the 24 port one with FCLA> built in AP...ￜ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
