I get better performance from the CRS125 compared to the RB493G. It's
also the same CPU as the RB2011, so I don't think Forrest will see any
difference in performance. I wouldn't expect any range increase on the
wireless compared to the 2011. But all those gigabit ports! I've noticed
the LCD sucks up about 10% CPU because it's polling all of the interface
stats in the background. That's with zero configuration on it. Turn the
LCD stuff off and it sits at 0%.
On 9/4/2015 7:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
Same here, it's been working great. It's worth noting that they're a
little light on processing power since they're designed to take
advantage of the switch chips.
On Friday, September 4, 2015, Mark - Myakka Technologies
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Forrest,
I've been using the 24 port CRS rackmount for at 18 months at our
office. Haven't had a problem with it. Doing basic firewall, DHCP,
NAT and a few VLANS. No issues.
--
Best regards,
Mark mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>
Myakka Technologies, Inc.
www.MyakkaTech.com <http://www.MyakkaTech.com>
Proud Sponsor of the Myakka City Relay For Life
http://www.RelayForLife.org/MyakkaCityFL
Please Donate at Please Donate at http://www.myakkatech.com/RFL.html
------
Friday, September 4, 2015, 6:37:47 PM, you wrote:
FCLA> So, I am currently using a RB2011 w/wireless as my 'edge
FCLA> device' here at packetflux.ￜￜ I seem to need more
gigabit ports
FCLA> for devices than it provides, and I also would like to repurpose
FCLA> it as a wifi booster in the end of the house where the rb2011
FCLA> doesn't reach well.
FCLA> So I'm looking at swapping it for a bigger 'tik.
FCLA> Is there anything 'different' about these CRS products
FCLA> that I need to know about?ￜ I'm looking at the 24 port one
with
FCLA> built in AP...ￜ
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
