Well they're both $99 MSRP =)

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hmmm, for some reason I thought the connectorized radio was more.
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:58 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>
> Same price.
>
> I'd rather go for one part to primarily stock.  I've got 2 or 3 integrated
> in the shop to maybe 50? connectorized.
>
> On top of that, I'd hope that Gino's sketch provides a more efficient
> illumination.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> But you can put an integrated radio on our dishes.  Isn’t the integrated
>> radio cheaper?
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:47 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>>
>> Is it a new customer?  Force 110 with a connectorized radio
>> Is it a new customer that wants a reflector?  Use the connectorized radio
>> Is it a customer with Canopy+Dish?  Use the connectorized radio
>>
>> Integrated radio would be for customers that are really close and could
>> hear multiple sectors.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> But why would you want to use the connectorized radio vs the epmp?
>>>
>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:39 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>>>
>>>
>>> Enabling you to use the reflectors already there and simply swap radios
>>> would be fantastic.  I'm sure there are many going from FSK to epmp.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Sep 16, 2015 2:35 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh, OK.  I actually developed a small patch antenna for the
>>>> connectorized radio back when these first came out.  I think it was for
>>>> you.    Last winter or spring.
>>>>
>>>> The holdup was waiting for a tiny radome.  I think I designed the
>>>> thermoform mold but never got any samples or something like that.  Could
>>>> still finish that project I guess.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Gino Villarini <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:49 AM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>>>>
>>>> just to clarify, we DO NOT want a epmp integrated holder! check the
>>>> sketch
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We can do this.  Whose dish and what frequency?
>>>>> We have a holder now for ePMP for our current dishes.  It fits some of
>>>>> the others I think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our older dishes had a D tube with a piece of bent conduit welded into
>>>>> it.  The SM snapped into place.  Hard to do some thing for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Later we had the rectangular tubing with the claw snap fit.  Our
>>>>> current ePMP holder should work with those.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Gino Villarini <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:17 AM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>> As we migrate Canopy to epmp, we find ourselves wishing for this:
>>>>>
>>>>> -Epmp holder for conn. epmp radio with illumination feedhorn for
>>>>> traditional dishes
>>>>>
>>>>> The idea would be that instead of replacing the whole canopy
>>>>> radio+dish with a Force110 unit, it would be more efficient to just remove
>>>>> the Canopy radio and reuse the dish with a conn. radio
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that we could pay $25-$30 for something like this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to