realistically how does anyone here or most anyone in the non jihad world even know what a bomb in a briefcase looks like, beyond what is on tv. The kid is a douche, his dad is a douche, whoever escalated it to an arrest is a douche, whoever reported it is a solid citizen, better to report and be wrong than scrape kids off walls. the president is a douche for inviting him to the white house before ensuring it wasn't a stunt. He will get 15 minutes, and a ton of free loot (look at the Microsoft care package) his dad will further his agenda, and some new travesty will pop up. the only thing that changed is his ability to fly unmolested, he made the top ten on the no fly lists I bet. He better hope he didn't social media it up about his plans for this stunt, he will have royally fucked his life up if he did.
I wonder if he was planning on adding batteries to make it a portable alarm clock On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:02 PM, - - <[email protected]> wrote: > Bombs in briefcases are something from a bad action movie... > > > > > > On September 22, 2015 at 3:53 PM George Skorup <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > I don't doubt there was prejudice based only on his name, but you know > > what I think of when I see a clock in a briefcase? A damn bomb! What he > > did was as dumb as painting over or taking the orange muzzle piece off > > of a water gun and then running around town with it. You're gonna get > > shot by the cops, dumb ass. > > > > Maybe that's un-PC of me. I don't give a shit. > > > > On 9/22/2015 5:34 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: > > > I saw a teevee interview with the kid and honestly he seemed like the > > > super nerdy kid (like myself) who would disassemble stuff and > > > reassemble it to make it better or "more cool". He really did not > > > seem provocative or anything. He was super excited to show off his > > > "invention". Granted to us "expert" adults his invention seems like > > > just a repackaging but give the kid a break, he's 14 and has probably > > > just learned about electronics and such. That was my take on the > > > revere engineering article and the news interview. > > > > > > 2 cents > > > > > > -Sean > > > > > > On Tuesday, September 22, 2015, Chuck McCown <[email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > That reverse engineering article lead me to wonder if the kid was > > > trying to be provocative. > > > *From:* Bill Prince > > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:17 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Hmmmm > > > Hmmm indeed. > > > > > > When I saw that (maybe 2 seconds of viewing time) on the evening > > > news, I came away with two things. One, where's the alleged > > > explosive? and Two, that's not even a MacGiver'ed clock, it's > > > merely a commercial "clock" that's been partially disassembled. > > > > > > My conclusion? The teacher and the police are idiots. > > > > > > bp > > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > > > On 9/22/2015 2:00 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > >> > > >> > http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2015/09/17/reverse-engineering-ahmed-mohameds-clock-and-ourselves/ > > > > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
