Talk to Dennis @ link tech (towercoverage) I know they have a feature like that, but I've never used it. I just do it in my head and with GPS sync I don't have issues, but I could see where if you didn't have sync nearby towers would clobber each other.
On Thursday, October 8, 2015, Craig House <[email protected]> wrote: > We already use radio mobile and Tower coverage.com but are not really > using it for channel planning purposes it shows us propagation but I've > never tried to use it to show channel layouts that's what I'm really > looking more for > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 8, 2015, at 13:54, That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Radiomobile - free > > Linkplanner is getting really valuable - free > > towercoverage.com - questionable but web based advanced implementation of > radiomobile, with lots of options - can get expensive > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Towercoverage.com >> >> >> On Thursday, October 8, 2015, Craig House <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> What do you guys use for planning out tower sector RF ?? We have >>> always been a Cambium FSK shop and never really had to worry much about >>> self interference. Now with FSK end of life and we are installing a lot >>> more UBNT M series, we need to think more about RF planning than we used >>> to. Suggestions? >>> >>> Craig >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > >
