All 480 people on the 5 450 sectors? That is quite a bit. How's capacity on the sectors looking?
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:53 PM, David <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > +2 > +3 > +4 > > all good stuff from Sean and Josh > We are doing something a little different by offloading all those older > subs to 450 and any smaller sites with <20 subs we use Epmp for > deployment and Rf planning is snap because of our scale we are able to do > this without stepping on our towers with 450. > Eventually if the small site grows to larger than 50 we will over build it > with 450 and start migrating subs to larger capacity platform. > > I just did a Sub inventory report on one tower we have with 5 sectors of > pmp450 3.65Ghz gear and we have 480 subs on there > We feed that beast with a ptp800 and ptp650 link LOL I am looking at > upgrading the router from a RB1100AH to a CCR to help > with flow. > Love this stuff :) > > > > > On 10/08/2015 02:22 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > After ePMP version 2.5 the radios can do 2.5ms frames. This is needed to > sync with FSK. I don't know how you marry them up but there's a good bit > of documentation that helps. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Craig House <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I assumed that there was a way to make the EP MP stuff work with the FSK >> stuff but I wasn't sure how to choose the right settings so that sink would >> work what is the trick >> We use 4 control slots 16 miles max distance and a 75% down link on our >> FSK >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 8, 2015, at 13:48, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Use ePMP and do what you were doing before. You can also match settings >> so ePMP will sync with FSK. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Craig House <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> What do you guys use for planning out tower sector RF ?? We have >>> always been a Cambium FSK shop and never really had to worry much about >>> self interference. Now with FSK end of life and we are installing a lot >>> more UBNT M series, we need to think more about RF planning than we used >>> to. Suggestions? >>> >>> Craig >>> >> >> > >
