Limiting factor is OOBE more than EIRP. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 14, 2015 2:13 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> wrote:
> So the EIRP limits from the FCC differ per manufacturer? I thought they > were the same across the board > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Any generic chart isn't going to be particularly accurate now, since >> every radio is a bit different under the new rules - especially at the band >> edges. >> >> You pretty much just have to follow what the firmware lets you do. >> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I had a chart, I dont know where its at, it went away when I went to >>> windows 10. Just showed EIRP by channel/size accounting for band edges >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If you’re talking equipment certified under the new FCC rules, there is >>>> no simple answer. It depends on the radio and may be different at every >>>> frequency even within the same band. So you need to check the firmware or >>>> a path calculator tool from the particular manufacturer, unless you are >>>> able to decipher the FCC equipment authorization filing. >>>> >>>> If you’re talking equipment grandfathered under the old rules, I >>>> believe it’s still +36 dBm in 5725-5850 for APs, and +30 dBm in DFS bands >>>> (less if channel is smaller than 20 MHz). If you want to know 5150-5250, >>>> that wasn’t even available under the old rules. >>>> >>>> I could be wrong, but that’s my understanding. >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 14, 2015 2:54 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] current 5ghz chart >>>> >>>> is there a current printable chart online I can see for printing as >>>> reference for EIRP rules >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
