Your responsibility is to expect what Ubnt offers and details to be true. Ubnt will almost certainly do a great job of covering their ass. No one wants to test the tolerance of the FCC.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 14, 2015 5:52 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> wrote: > so how trustworthy is new hardware and the updated firmwares from UBNT and > cambium to be compliant as long as I have the real antenna gain in? I don't > ever foresee the fcc tooling around my network, but Ive worked hard to get > compliant, and I'm treating everything as if it falls under the new rules. > My chart may have been a vendors limits, its just what I was going by. I > do know the 5.6.2 firmware from ubnt would alow me to go above what the > chart said > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Ty Featherling <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yes the rules are the same for all but with their current hardware >> limitations the different products have to use different power levels to >> still meet the OOBE requirements. >> >> >> >> -Ty >> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Limiting factor is OOBE more than EIRP. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Oct 14, 2015 2:13 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> So the EIRP limits from the FCC differ per manufacturer? I thought they >>>> were the same across the board >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Any generic chart isn't going to be particularly accurate now, since >>>>> every radio is a bit different under the new rules - especially at the >>>>> band >>>>> edges. >>>>> >>>>> You pretty much just have to follow what the firmware lets you do. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I had a chart, I dont know where its at, it went away when I went to >>>>>> windows 10. Just showed EIRP by channel/size accounting for band edges >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> If you’re talking equipment certified under the new FCC rules, there >>>>>>> is no simple answer. It depends on the radio and may be different at >>>>>>> every >>>>>>> frequency even within the same band. So you need to check the firmware >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> a path calculator tool from the particular manufacturer, unless you are >>>>>>> able to decipher the FCC equipment authorization filing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you’re talking equipment grandfathered under the old rules, I >>>>>>> believe it’s still +36 dBm in 5725-5850 for APs, and +30 dBm in DFS >>>>>>> bands >>>>>>> (less if channel is smaller than 20 MHz). If you want to know >>>>>>> 5150-5250, >>>>>>> that wasn’t even available under the old rules. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I could be wrong, but that’s my understanding. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 14, 2015 2:54 PM >>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] current 5ghz chart >>>>>>> >>>>>>> is there a current printable chart online I can see for printing as >>>>>>> reference for EIRP rules >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
