Maybe they just aren't as bright as everyone is giving them credit. Except
for Chuck of course. It seems to me they believe wireless is near dead so
it isn't worth it. Solar being the future and all. Really I think it is a
case of shiny object syndrome. UBNT always seems to have lacked some focus,
or at least perseverance. Not to bash then to much. They defiant have a
value product.

I think they are hurting as the price of what I would term as better
products have closed the price gap a good bit.

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 7:27 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

> That's what my guess would be too, but the airMax protocol was supposedly
> completely rewritten for the AC radios... you would think they would've
> designed it with sync in mind this time.
>
> If other companies can make sync work with atheros chipsets, I have to
> assume Ubiquiti could too... if they really wanted to.
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Many here seem to assume the problem is too difficult for Ubiquiti
>> engineers to figure out.  Maybe.  But if I had to guess, my money would be
>> on they boxed themselves in by developing the hardware and the airMax
>> protocol first, and then couldn’t get GPS sync to work without starting
>> over.
>>
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:04 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT
>>
>>
>> Basically a sync capable hardware.
>>
>> Phy being physical.  Layer 1.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Oct 17, 2015 6:41 PM, "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm probably the only one that doesn't know this but what is a "proprietary
>>> 802.11 PHY layer"?
>>>
>>>
>>> Jeff Broadwick
>>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
>>> 312-205-2519 Office
>>> 574-220-7826 Cell
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> On Oct 17, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> proprietary 802.11 PHY layer
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to