It's greater gain, definitely more range.  Also a more vertical spread and
less horizontal, which means you'll pick up less noise across the horizon
(and more vertically but not many towers are stacked :)

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 3, 2015 4:50 PM, "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <[email protected]> wrote:

> You are supposed to get greater distance with the 180 than the past
> integrated SM because of their new floating antenna design.  Has anyone
> tested that out?
>
> Jeff Broadwick
> ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
> 312-205-2519 Office
> 574-220-7826 Cell
> [email protected]
>
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I think they're expecting you to use Force180 for nearby customers and
> Force200 for farther customers...
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Oh wow…    maybe I am missing something.
>>
>>
>>
>> If the KP dish with standard SM does SM dB + 9 dB, and the Force 180 (no
>> reflector) does standard SM + 3db, did we just lose 6dB of gain (NET) if we
>> can’t use reflectors?
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 03, 2015 4:26 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
>>
>>
>>
>> It's turned 90*.  I don't know if KP tested the reflector with it, but I
>> would safely assume it won't illuminate as well as previous.  It uses the
>> same holder but will also use a new one that doesn't suck.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Does the Force180 have the same form factor as the previous integrated
>> unit?   Does it use the same KP performance reflector?  Same holder, etc.?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *David
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 02, 2015 5:01 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
>>
>>
>>
>> 2.4 seems to be the best option for access standards
>> Of course apple really really wants to be the new standard for wifi :)
>>
>> On 12/02/2015 01:43 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>
>> I ignore anything 2.4 because I consider it useless in my environment.
>> Maybe that's it.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>> <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 2, 2015 1:41:21 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
>>
>> Force 200 comes in 2.4 and 5 GHz bands.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, the model scheme from Cambium can become even more insane.  And you
>> thought it would stop at C0498732975928402580SA9S!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Yes. I wasn't aware there was a 2.4 version until I heard it here, but
>> maybe I just wasn't paying attention before. There is definitely a 5 GHz
>> version.
>>
>>
>> Much nicer to assemble. Much.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Josh Baird" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 2, 2015 1:27:57 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180
>>
>>
>>
>> So, there is a 5ghz Force 200 on it's way?  I thought it was only 2.4.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> There is a shortage/lack of Force 110.  My reps gave me a heads up a
>> month ago and I ordered 3 month supply to be safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> I've heard the first of the year is supposed to deliver Force 200 5 GHz.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I think the integrated is discontinued... anyway, I certainly
>> wouldn't wait for them, the Force 180 is the same price and much nicer.
>>
>> Is that why there's been a shortage of Force 110s? I thought it was still
>> going to be a few months until the 5ghz Force 200 was shipping...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I've heard that the older lines have been halted with the expectation
>> everyone is buying the new ones - force 180 and force 200.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd suggest using Force 180 and 200 for 5 GHz.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Louis Arsenault <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> What is the story with the ePMP line?
>>
>> I have had ePMP integrated units on back order for several weeks now.
>> Has Cambium stopped production on them?
>> Since we are 5Ghz then we should move to the Force 180?
>>
>> --
>> -Louis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to