I don't think the empire worries about OSHA or carries a large workers
comp policy.
Steve D wrote:
Well, a planet sized base doesn't get built in thirty years with
things like "safety" and "security" getting in the way.
Sheesh, we're trying to be efficient here.
Side note, this is my numero uno film of the year and ain't nobody
talkin' me out of that. It was fun and it was all that I wanted in a
new SW film!
-Steve D
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Cameron Crum <cc...@wispmon.com
<mailto:cc...@wispmon.com>> wrote:
Or not build bottomless pits with precarious bridges and no
handrails.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Jay Weekley
<par...@cyberbroadband.net <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote:
You would think they would learn how to protect their reactors
better.
Chuck McCown wrote:
Bigger, same weakness.
-----Original Message----- From: Jay Weekley
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 8:45 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review
I heard there is a new death star.
Adam Moffett wrote:
Something about the pacing was weird.�
I enjoyed the little insights into the lives of storm
troopers.
You are right about repeated themes though....Ray
(sp?) is the new Luke.� Luke is the new Yoda.� Old
Han Solo is the new Han Solo.� The story is all
about "the resistance" against the new empire so that
the good guys can remain underdogs.� The Republic is
talked about, but seen only briefly.
I would have liked them to have drawn upon on Timothy
Zahn's Thrawn Trilogy for inspiration.
Star Wars
OK, I was there at the beginning, watching it with
my girlfriend and her family.� So old and jaded
for certain.�
�
If you saw that original one one, you also saw
this new one.� Just retooled.� Same thematic
elements, story arc, crisis etc etc.�
Some of the scenes could have been shared.� Just
no garbage compactor, but there is reference to it.�
�
Sorry but it sure as hell is not worth standing in
line to see.�
I got free tickets, and it was barely worth the
price of admission.�
