there are way more than 2 items left unanswered!

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net>
wrote:

> Just saw it, and for someone that stood in line for the first trilogy in
> the 80s, I think it was very good and more true to those than I thought
> they could ever get it!
>
> The humor was great, the nostalgia was on overload :)
>
> The story tied up a lot more than I thought it would given that two other
> movies are scheduled.
>
> There were really only one or two items that are left apparently
> unresolved.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 9:25 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review
>
> I don't think the empire worries about OSHA or carries a large workers
> comp policy.
>
> Steve D wrote:
> > Well, a planet sized base doesn't get built in thirty years with
> > things like "safety" and "security" getting in the way.
> > Sheesh, we're trying to be efficient here.
> >
> > Side note, this is my numero uno film of the year and ain't nobody
> > talkin' me out of that.  It was fun and it was all that I wanted in a
> > new SW film!
> >
> > -Steve D
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Cameron Crum <cc...@wispmon.com
> > <mailto:cc...@wispmon.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Or not build bottomless pits with precarious bridges and no
> >     handrails.
> >
> >     On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Jay Weekley
> >     <par...@cyberbroadband.net <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>>
> wrote:
> >
> >         You would think they would learn how to protect their reactors
> >         better.
> >
> >         Chuck McCown wrote:
> >
> >             Bigger, same weakness.
> >
> >             -----Original Message----- From: Jay Weekley
> >             Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 8:45 PM
> >             To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
> >             Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Movie Review
> >
> >             I heard there is a new death star.
> >
> >             Adam Moffett wrote:
> >
> >                 Something about the pacing was weird.�
> >
> >                 I enjoyed the little insights into the lives of storm
> >                 troopers.
> >
> >                 You are right about repeated themes though....Ray
> >                 (sp?) is the new Luke.� Luke is the new Yoda.� Old
> >                 Han Solo is the new Han Solo.� The story is all
> >                 about "the resistance" against the new empire so that
> >                 the good guys can remain underdogs.� The Republic is
> >                 talked about, but seen only briefly.
> >
> >                 I would have liked them to have drawn upon on Timothy
> >                 Zahn's Thrawn Trilogy for inspiration.
> >
> >
> >                     Star Wars
> >                     OK, I was there at the beginning, watching it with
> >                     my girlfriend and her family.� So old and jaded
> >                     for certain.�
> >                     �
> >                     If you saw that original one one, you also saw
> >                     this new one.� Just retooled.� Same thematic
> >                     elements, story arc, crisis etc etc.�
> >                     Some of the scenes could have been shared.� Just
> >                     no garbage compactor, but there is reference to
> it.�
> >                     �
> >                     Sorry but it sure as hell is not worth standing in
> >                     line to see.�
> >                     I got free tickets, and it was barely worth the
> >                     price of admission.�
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to