I don't know off hand what the cables cost, those were some I already had.
I think I've gotten them for $3-5 each in the past.
On Jan 14, 2016 8:10 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:

> If  it is SMA on the radio, I could  have flying leads coming out of the
> back of the antenna thereby dispensing with a couple of connectors.
>
> How much did the cables cost  you?
>
> *From:* Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2016 6:56 PM
> *To:* af <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900mhz PMP450i with dual polarity panel
>
>
> Yeah, SMA on the radio.
> No, those antennas didn't come with cables, I'm guessing they can supply
> cables, but I didn't think to ask... the antennas appear to be intended to
> use with ubnt Rockets (they have a holder for one built on), which would
> use the same connectors.
> On Jan 14, 2016 7:50 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Cables and connectors are not cheap when manufacturing.  PITA.  Hmmm.
>> SMA on the radio?
>>
>> Did the chinese antenna come with cables?
>>
>> *From:* Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2016 6:44 PM
>> *To:* af <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900mhz PMP450i with dual polarity panel
>>
>>
>> No, they don't come with cables - those are permanently attached to the
>> Cambium yagis.
>> On Jan 14, 2016 7:40 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Possibly.  I have the mold for the cover.  Back would be aluminum.  Just
>>> need a nice pocket that slips over and interfaces with the radio.   Does
>>> the radio come with cables?
>>>
>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2016 6:33 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900mhz PMP450i with dual polarity panel
>>>
>>>
>>> Slip on stinger would be way faster.  Could you match the price?
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Jan 14, 2016 8:31 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would have to have a large commitment to meet that price for a slip
>>>> on stinger version.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2016 5:58 PM
>>>> *To:* af <[email protected]>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900mhz PMP450i with dual polarity panel
>>>>
>>>> This is the antenna: http://www.lanbowan.com/ANT915D12C-DP.htm
>>>>
>>>> The antennas themselves are pretty cheap - they charged me $41.61/each,
>>>> but shipping was quite expensive (they sent them DHL - there are obviously
>>>> cheaper ways). I suspect that if you ordered a large enough quantity to get
>>>> a decent shipping rate, even after adding jumper cables, it would still be
>>>> a bit cheaper than the Cambium yagis.
>>>>
>>>> I did do a little testing with V/H... but it was kind of inconclusive,
>>>> the signal level was only slightly weaker, but when I ran a link test, it
>>>> was much worse - about 45m down vs 90m, I tried holding the Cambium yagi at
>>>> a 45 degree angle and it was pretty similar results - 70m vs 90m and
>>>> slightly weaker signal. I'm not sure if that was anything to do with the
>>>> polarity being mismatched, or if it was just that H/V doesn't work as well
>>>> as slant at that particular location... also, I was just holding thing
>>>> antennas for the H/V tests and they were mounted at +/-45, so that could
>>>> account for some of it too.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What’s it cost?
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2016 3:36 PM
>>>>> *To:* af <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 900mhz PMP450i with dual polarity panel
>>>>>
>>>>> Fresh from China :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I tested it at two different customer's houses, and signal levels were
>>>>> consistently within 1db of the Cambium yagis. Not quite as clean of a
>>>>> package as the Cambium antennas, but it works and it's not a yagi... I did
>>>>> have to replace the bracket to make it dual slant though.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to