Nice report.  I wish all companies would fess up like this when there is an 
issue.  
I can see where memory issues can manifest in a large number of symptoms.  Good 
that you can reproduce it.  I have been in your situation many times even 
creating custom hardware to catch other hardware messing up so we could figure 
out what is happening.  Not fun until you can reproduce it.  

I am not familiar with the term memory coherency.  I understand laser 
coherency.  And phase coherency and even spread spectrum coherency.   So I 
looked it up.  I think we used to have a different name for this... like 
asynchronous bus arbiter?

From: Aaron Schneider 
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 5:50 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450 Watchdog resets - was: To Cambium With Love- 
Replace the bad ePMP units.

Hi Everyone –

 

Sorry for the delay in response on this thread.  I’d like to give an update of 
where we are with this issue.

 

First off, I would like to apologize for  the issues that this is causing.  We 
have heard reports for awhile in varying fashion, and Tushar had been talking 
about having things like this for quite some time, but we were having issues 
finding some correlation between reports (configuration, network topology, 
etc), as well as being unable to recreate the issue in our lab on demand.  This 
issue appears to have definitely got worse in the 13.4 release and is becoming 
more widespread as the weather turns.    

 

What we have found out in the last several weeks is that there is an issue with 
the memory controller code in the FPGA.  What this leads to is memory coherency 
being lost which actually has now been verified to lead to several issues.  We 
had seen reports of various resets over time but had no reason to correlate 
them to one root cause until now.   The most prevalent of these is the Watchdog 
Reset without any accompanying crash log.  The other issues with the same root 
cause are the Illegal Instruction crash, the Invalid NiBuf crash, as well as 
any Null Exception Handler crash.  The bottom line is, when memory contents 
glitch on your software, it depends on when it happens as to what the outcome 
is.  We have found this to be very reproducible at very cold temperatures (-20C 
-- -50C), but it has been seen and reported at higher temperatures, just not as 
often.

 

The nature of the FPGA based memory controller is that there can be timing 
issues that get exacerbated at extreme temperatures.  If you don’t have proper 
constraints in place for a given signal path, its timing characteristics can 
change on you as temperature changes.  Also, if you don’t have a proper 
constraint in place, even recompiling the FPGA can change the characteristics 
that then make what used to work fine susceptible to extremes.   Something 
happened with the 13.4 FPGA that brought this to the edge such that it is now a 
problem and as we are seeing with winter cold coming in, becoming much more 
prevalent at cold temperatures.  13.4 and 13.4.1 have the same FPGA.  14.1.2 
has a new FPGA and there have been some improvements made in this area, but we 
have found it is still susceptible to the problem.

 

We are reproducing the problem in our lab and we have multiple developers 
digging in to figure out what is going on.  These types of issues with timing 
are generally very difficult to find and fix, but this is our highest priority 
right now and we will not have another release until this is fixed.  

 

I’ve talked mostly about 13.4 and 13.4.1 here, but the nature of this issue and 
how it can interact with hardware doesn’t preclude it from having been the 
cause of the issues some (like Tushar) have seen over time.  Once we have a fix 
for this, we will be adding more rigorous regression testing including an 
internal HW memory test to validate that this type of memory issue doesn’t come 
back again.

 

>From what we’ve seen and heard, this issue only affects the 450 AP FPGA and is 
>not an issue on the 450 SM, 430AP/SM, nor the 450i devices.  The 450i is a 
>very different architecture and has a hardware based memory controller and 
>watchdog timer whereas on the 450/430 based devices, these items are in the 
>FPGA.

 

 

Again, I apologize for the severe inconvenience and realize that it is getting 
colder and colder in NA so we are racing against the clock with this.   As soon 
as we have any updates and new open beta loads with a fix, I’ll let you know.

 

I appreciate your patience.

 

Regards,

-Aaron

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Sullivan
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 4:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450 Watchdog resets - was: To Cambium With Love- 
Replace the bad ePMP units.

 

I was assured today that the issue isn't the hardware.� Evidently this issue 
can be solved with an upcoming software upgrade.
Time will tell.
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/13-2-to-13-4-System-Reset-Exception-Watchdog-Reset/td-p/43347/page/2

On 1/21/2016 4:02 PM, Joe Falaschi wrote:

  We have some APs that have uptime over 60 days but many reboot every 1-3 
weeks. �This is definitely an outlier. �We've been in contact with Cambium 
on this via an open ticket and sending them all of the information they request 
and nobody has said oh gosh that is bad hardware RMA it. �So, we're just 
going around and around. �We'll end up just replacing it and hoping they will 
take it back because obviously this is bad. �We are running 14.x per their 
request. �We saw this on 13.x as well. 

   

  Joe

   

   

  On Jan 21, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:





    Joe, that is seriously bad.� I see watchdog resets and a few stack dumps, 
but uptime on 450 APs is typically 2-4 weeks, despite the recent cold weather, 
in fact I don�t think it has been more common than it was last summer.� I 
have not gone to 14.x though, everything is still on 13.2.

    �

    So either you have a bad unit, or 14.x is making it much worse.� If 
everyone was seeing resets every few minutes or hours, I think there would be 
villagers with torches and pitchforks outside Cambium HQ.

    �

    Brian from FVI does have a thread on the Cambium Community about this.

    �

    FWIW, I have one 450i 900 MHz which necessarily is on 14.1, and it does not 
appear to be having watchdog resets.� Lightly loaded however, just 2 subs.

    �

    �

    From: Joe Falaschi 

    Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:34 AM

    To: [email protected] 

    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450 Watchdog resets - was: To Cambium With 
Love- Replace the bad ePMP units.

    �

    We see a ton of reboots on the 450 platform as well.� It's getting pretty 
frustrating simply because this is such a long term issue.� One of my APs has 
rebooted 195 times (now running 14.1.2).� They are saying we should replace 
the AP but it is unclear if we can RMA it or not.� We do have an open ticket. 

    �

    Joe Falaschi

    e-vergent

    �

    �

    �

    <Screen Shot 2016-01-21 at 11.30.16 AM.png>

    On Jan 20, 2016, at 9:26 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:





      Hum�� sounds very similar.�� It�s temperature sensitive as well 
- gets far worse with low temperatures, and we are having pretty cold temps 
this week.�� 

      �

      Extremely frustrating and causing real customer complaints.

      �

      Mark

      �

        On Jan 20, 2016, at 9:28 PM, Tushar Patel <[email protected]> wrote:

        �

        Over two years we have been seeing random reboot. We were told over and 
over again you are the only one.� Then few people started reporting.

        �

        But cambium never could get bottom of the problems for two years so, I 
gave up on cambium fixing this random reboot.� We stop calling them about it. 

        �

        As the new versions of the software has come out over two years we have 
see the frequency of the problem reduce but not gone away.

        Tushar 

        �


        On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> wrote:

          Tushar, 

          �

          What did you give up on?�� Or do?

          �

          Please note the mailing and shipping address change below:

          �

          Mark Radabaugh
          Amplex
          22690 Pemberville Rd

          Luckey, OH 43443
          419-837-5015 x1021
          [email protected]

          �

            On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Tushar Patel <[email protected]> wrote:

            �

            That's what they used to tell us too.� We have given up on the 
subject now. 

            Tushar 

            �


            On Jan 20, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> wrote:

              Wait - they keep telling us we are the only ones that this 
happens to with 450?

              �

              So who else is having reboot-o-rama with 450�s?

              �

              Mark

              �

                On Jan 20, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Brian Sullivan 
<[email protected]> wrote:

                �

                I wish they would fix/replace the bad 450 AP's that suffer from 
Watchdog Resets.� 
                Although replacing 100 450 AP's is cheaper than ePMP.� :-/

                On 1/20/2016 12:11 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

                  Why would making the memory faster degrade performance?

                  �

                  �

                  Josh Luthman
                  Office: 937-552-2340
                  Direct: 937-552-2343
                  1100 Wayne St
                  Suite 1337
                  Troy, OH 45373

                  �

                  On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet 
Communications Inc <[email protected]> wrote:

                    Hello Cambium,


                    �

                    At the MidWest-IX launch party last night, several of us 
Indiana WISPs compared notes on the �cold weather� problems we are seeing 
with ePMPs.� It was very interesting to learn we are experience identical 
problems across the spectrum. 

                    We all understand this is a DRAM issue with certain units 
you have identified.� We also understand the firmware RC that has been made 
available to fix this short term.

                    The bottom line is we are very frustrated and grow tired of 
dealing with it.� 


                    �

                    Our concern is simple.� If your software fix 
�degrades� the performance of the product or triggers other issues, as it 
has been suggested, we would prefer a full recall and replacement program 
immediately.


                    �

                    If the suggestion that the fix will degrade the product 
performance is inaccurate and not cause other issues, I would like for this to 
be made public.� 


                    �

                    Thank you,


                    �

                    Tyson Burris, President 
                    Internet Communications Inc. 
                    739 Commerce Dr. 
                    Franklin, IN 46131 
                    � 
                    317-738-0320 Daytime # 
                    317-412-1540 Cell/Direct # 
                    Online: www.surfici.net 


                    �

                    <Mail Attachment.png>

                    What can ICI do for you? 


                    Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh 
Wifi/Hotzones - IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure. 
                    � 
                    CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the 
                    addressee shown. It contains information that is 
                    confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, 
                    dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents 
by 
                    unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly 
                    prohibited.

                    �

                    �


                    �

                  �

                 

              �

          �

      �

    �

   

 

Reply via email to