We purchased or Cisco equipment refurbished from Ray Hoffman at Rhfive. They always looked almost brand new and were at a great price.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016, 5:50 AM Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Polycom are very solid phones … I’d put them “head to head” with the Cisco > phones (the non Linksys branded ones) … different price bracket than the > Grandstream/Linksys etc phones but the quality (look and feel) is quite > noticeably different in my opinion too .. > > > > Are they worth the difference? I’d say “it depends” … I used to have > Snom and then Aastra phones in my home and they worked ok – eventually they > died off (3-4 years) and I went to Polycom .. couple of more years and I’ll > be more confident in saying they were worth the price (almost double if I > recall)… YMMV.. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Christopher Gray > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2016 12:04 AM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Sip Phones > > > > I've heard decent things about the Grandstream DECT phones, but all 2nd > hand and never tried them. Anyone have experience with those? > > > > A Wired Phone Question: > > I use mostly Linksys / Cisco wired with good results (good sound quality, > good handsets). How does Polycom compare to the standard Cisco units? > > > ------------------------------ > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyone used the Panasonic sip phones? I have a business office that > doesn’t like the UBNT products due to the feel of the handset etc. They > also want a DECT wireless option. > > > > Personally I am OK with AASTRA but in this situation I am trying to make > front office folks happy. We will be turning down their old panasonic key > system soon and I want to try to approximate the type of handset they have > been using. Could just swap handsets but they don’t work and they don’t > fit the switchhook of the sip phones. > >
