I just read forrests breakdown, very interesting on the drop in voltage. We also use the GIGEAPC SS I wonder if there is any voltage drop across those as well
In my case above, Im better off just independently powering the SM backhaul since it will be going away in the future anyway. Our other packetflux epmp sync deployment we had to just use internal sync since it kept dropping pulses from the syncinjector, but I like the independent port controls anyhow On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Ain't no sync on those bruh > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> One of deese... >> http://www.mccowntech.com/din-rail-mount-for-surge-suppressors-protectors/ >> An tree of deese... >> >> http://www.mccowntech.com/rack-mount-gige-poe-apc-surge-suppressor-power-inserter-protector/ >> >> Use any voltage you want on each circuit. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Monday, February 1, 2016 3:02:44 PM >> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Packetflux gigabit syncinjector force connectorized >> epmp 24 V >> >> I have a site we will initially feed with an epmp force 110 >> (connectorized epmp) and serve two EPMPgps APs from it. To conserver space, >> I want to just run all three radios off a gigabit syncinjector, but the >> epmp connectorized is limited to 30 v. >> Is there any issue running the EPMP gps APs on 24 volts? >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
