Brocades offering is basically vyatta with some upgrades / tweaks and a
massive performance increase with DPDK. Add in a few Chelsio T5 10Gbps or
40Gbps ports and it might be a hell of a platform, as long as you don't
need mpls. Juniper vMX does has mpls/vpls support.
On Feb 6, 2016 10:24 AM, "Josh Baird" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I looked at vMX months ago.  It was far from 'production-ready' in my
> opinion, although I think it's finally starting to mature a little bit.
> Lack of hypervisor options (no ESX at the time), crappy documentation, and
> a general lack of knowledge on the product it's self from Juniper made me
> quickly change my mind.  The seems to be the general consensus with the
> community as well.  Cisco's CSR seems to be a much more mature product at
> this point.  I don't know anything about Brocade's offering.
>
> For what it's worth, we went with MX104 instead.
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I may be looking at some juniper vMX and Brocade vrouter for other
>> projects in the near future for low/intermediate routing (10+ Gbps). Both
>> use Intel DPDK, similar CLI.
>> Most of us aren't buying MX960s.  ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Saturday, February 6, 2016 9:43:16 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 10G router(s) with redundancy?
>>
>> I agree, but that can get very expensive.
>> On Feb 6, 2016 9:42 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The best form of redundancy is two separate units with no dependency on
>>> each other.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected]>
>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>> *Sent: *Friday, February 5, 2016 5:38:40 PM
>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] 10G router(s) with redundancy?
>>>
>>> What are some options for 10G capable routers that won't break the bank
>>> that have 3+ 10G ports? Was planning two ccr1072 with ibgp but maybe I
>>> should be considering something else ?
>>>
>>> Also what are some models of 10G switches (sfp+) that have 4+ ports?
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to