But addresses in this area are often geolocated wrong, plus the building is set back off the road.
From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 8:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if not very accurately, from inside a single floor wood framed house... My oneplus one will pick up 6 satellites while standing in a central hallway 15'+ from any window. Should be accurate enough to get a location within 75'. All bets are off if it is a concrete framed apartment building or something like that. I still find it amazing that anything works at -162 RSL. Thanks to tiny channel size and very basic modulation. On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: Canopy NAT seems to break it with regularity. It might also fail if the GPS location that it reports is not within a 1/4 mile of where the customer address is. Also requires enough GPS (like near a window) to get a GPS lock. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: What are the typical reasons for these not to work?� From the user guide it appears to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that prevents a VPN? � Verizon support told the customer they needed a Class A address.� WTF?� Did they maybe mean it can't be a class A address?� Customer uses 10.x.x.x addresses internally, behind Cisco ASA firewall (which I don't manage). � I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500 packets, I think that means something is using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal?
