Well the one they use in the Samsung device isn't modern. It's shit. My phone can get GPS in a second or two anywhere in the house. This device takes 30+ minutes at a window.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if not very accurately, from > inside a single floor wood framed house... My oneplus one will pick up 6 > satellites while standing in a central hallway 15'+ from any window. > Should be accurate enough to get a location within 75'. > > All bets are off if it is a concrete framed apartment building or > something like that. > > I still find it amazing that anything works at -162 RSL. Thanks to tiny > channel size and very basic modulation. > On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Canopy NAT seems to break it with regularity. It might also fail if the >> GPS location that it reports is not within a 1/4 mile of where the customer >> address is. >> >> Also requires enough GPS (like near a window) to get a GPS lock. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> >> What are the typical reasons for these not to work?� From the user >> guide it appears to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that prevents a VPN? >> � >> Verizon support told the customer they needed a Class A address.� >> WTF?� Did they maybe mean it *can't* be a class A address?� Customer >> uses 10.x.x.x addresses internally, behind Cisco ASA firewall (which I >> don't manage). >> � >> I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500 packets, I think that means something >> is using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal? >> >> >>
