Darin, that is a good point and one I overlooked. In this particular situation it might actually not be the worst thing though. I'll have to look at the customer locations a little more carefully. I want to add a single high bandwidth customer on a dedicated AP but not increase antenna count on the tower.
Joe On Feb 19, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Darin Steffl wrote: > Joe, > > This is essentially a 130* antenna or two 65* patterns to make 130*. The > beams do not cover the same direction if that's what you're thinking. The PDF > below shows what these antennas do. > > http://www.kpperformance.ca/product_documents/get/document/id/145/ > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Joe Falaschi <[email protected]> wrote: > Is anyone using this antenna: > http://www.kpperformance.ca/two-5ghz-hv-antennas-in-one-radome? > > Deployment wise I'm thinking one radio would be an existing UBNT Rocket M and > the other could be a UBNT Rocket AC or EPMP. It seems that is the intention > of this product. I'm just curious if others have implemented it with > success. Also curious how much channel separation you used? Did you plan > any different considering it's the same antenna enclosure vs two separate > antennas? The specs say there is 40db of separation between the two radios. > > Joe Falaschi > e-vergent > > > > -- > Darin Steffl > Minnesota WiFi > www.mnwifi.com > 507-634-WiFi > Like us on Facebook
