In that instance (5GHz), it is more of a money saving measure for persons
who pay per sector.  Also, it has the added effect of double capacity from
a 120.   I am using the 2.4 / 5GHz combo antennas, and they are 90 degrees
but both on the exact same path.  I really like them.  They have made a ton
of improvements to their sector design.  It took months for me to get them
after ordering, but they are pretty awesome.  It's a beast of a sector.
Not like the triple UBNT sector at WISPAPALOOZA, but large nonetheless.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Joe Falaschi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Darin, that is a good point and one I overlooked.  In this particular
> situation it might actually not be the worst thing though.  I'll have to
> look at the customer locations a little more carefully.  I want to add a
> single high bandwidth customer on a dedicated AP but not increase antenna
> count on the tower.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> This is essentially a 130* antenna or two 65* patterns to make 130*. The
> beams do not cover the same direction if that's what you're thinking. The
> PDF below shows what these antennas do.
>
> http://www.kpperformance.ca/product_documents/get/document/id/145/
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Joe Falaschi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Is anyone using this antenna:
>> http://www.kpperformance.ca/two-5ghz-hv-antennas-in-one-radome?
>>
>> Deployment wise I'm thinking one radio would be an existing UBNT Rocket M
>> and the other could be a UBNT Rocket AC or EPMP.  It seems that is the
>> intention of this product.  I'm just curious if others have implemented it
>> with success.  Also curious how much channel separation you used?  Did you
>> plan any different considering it's the same antenna enclosure vs two
>> separate antennas?  The specs say there is 40db of separation between the
>> two radios.
>>
>> Joe Falaschi
>> e-vergent
>
>
>
>
> --
> Darin Steffl
> Minnesota WiFi
> www.mnwifi.com
> 507-634-WiFi
> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
>
>
>

Reply via email to