Why not just move everything to ePMP? Put up one sector with ePMP, new customers go on it, and customers over time you can migrate.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Joe Falaschi <[email protected]> wrote: > UBNT M is the legacy network. We're mostly doing EPMP for new deployments. > > In this case it would probably end up being a UBNT AC due to the > connection speed we need to deploy for a single new customer though. We're > having mixed results with a mixed N and AC network on the beta firmware > hence we're looking to deploy multiple APs and not mix them. > > Joe > > > > On Feb 19, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Why would you do an ePMP and Ubnt AP side by side??? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Joe Falaschi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is anyone using this antenna: >> http://www.kpperformance.ca/two-5ghz-hv-antennas-in-one-radome? >> >> Deployment wise I'm thinking one radio would be an existing UBNT Rocket M >> and the other could be a UBNT Rocket AC or EPMP. It seems that is the >> intention of this product. I'm just curious if others have implemented it >> with success. Also curious how much channel separation you used? Did you >> plan any different considering it's the same antenna enclosure vs two >> separate antennas? The specs say there is 40db of separation between the >> two radios. >> >> Joe Falaschi >> e-vergent > > > >
