600SSH I think is the newest.

On Friday, February 19, 2016, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

> The latest model is 200SSH.  These were bought new (or allegedly new)
> within the past few months.
> They haven't discontinued it have they?
>
> On 2/19/2016 3:42 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
>
> Isn't the 200SS about 10 years old.
>
> I'd replace it with something newer
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 19, 2016, Adam Moffett <
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> I would have assumed they weren't supposed to short the + and - wires
>> when clamped.  That would be the opposite of protection lol. I also don't
>> get why the short to stay there with the power shut off.  I spent a good
>> 15-20 minutes checking things with the power shut off, and the short didn't
>> go away until I disconnected and reconnected wires on the SS.  I would have
>> guessed the clamping would stop when the over current or over voltage
>> condition went away.
>>
>> I did eventually find literature saying that the 200SS can take up to
>> 6.5amps.  This BS uses 90 watts on bootup, and maybe 60 watts in normal
>> operation.  The spec sheet says 125 Watt max.  So somewhere from 1.5 to 2.5
>> amps.
>>
>> Maybe that particular SS is just broken in some way?  If so, it's a
>> dangerous mode of failure.
>>
>> On 2/19/2016 2:30 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>>
>>> Definitely sounds like the SS was clamping. Maybe the SS thought a surge
>>> occurred at initial startup of the power supply? And FYI, I have used Traco
>>> TSP 48v supplies with -48 radios just fine, output is floating.
>>>
>>> On 2/19/2016 10:40 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...my first thought of course was maybe it was hooked up wrong the
>>>> first time.  The four 16ga wires hold their shape pretty well and I didn't
>>>> have to re-bend them to fit, so I'm pretty sure they were on there
>>>> correctly.
>>>>
>>>> People talk about SS's "clamping" or "clamping to ground". Could that
>>>> cause a short?  I never tested the power wires against ground.
>>>>
>>>> If you're thinking +48 and -48 mixed on the tower, there are only two
>>>> devices on the tower right now.  One base station and one backhaul, and
>>>> they're both -48.  There's some 24v stuff in the enclosure at the bottom
>>>> (switch, site monitor), but none of those have a ground referenced to power
>>>> and they're isolated from the other stuff by a 48v to 24v converter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/19/2016 11:27 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So I went out to a new location yesterday afternoon just to turn the
>>>>> breakers on.  The power co had just plugged in the meter a few days prior.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Traco 48v power supply there immediately went into an alarm
>>>>> state.  After some troubleshooting I found a dead short on the -48v power
>>>>> bus (terminal blocks with jumpers actually).  The short ended up being on
>>>>> the power cable to a Wimax base station, I read 0 ohms between + and - on
>>>>> that cable.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a Motorola 200SS surge suppressor within 5' of the power bus,
>>>>> and then about 80' of wire to the base station.  I checked resistance
>>>>> between + and - on each side of the SS and read 0 ohms both ways.  There
>>>>> are actually 4x 16ga wires going to the top, so two were screwed down to +
>>>>> on the load side of the SS and two on the - side.
>>>>>
>>>>> That whole part was backstory.  This is where the mystery starts.
>>>>>
>>>>> I pulled all 4 wires off the load side of the SS to see if I could
>>>>> narrow down which pair was shorted, and I couldn't find a short. I checked
>>>>> the load side and the supply side of the SS and it was open on both sides.
>>>>> So then I reconnected the wires to the SS and checked again - no short.  I
>>>>> plugged the BTS back into the bus...powered up just fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> So where did the short circuit come from and where did it go? In
>>>>> hindsight it seems like it had to be in the SS or before it. If it was
>>>>> shorted at the top there would have been > 0 ohms of resistance with the
>>>>> 80' of wire.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to