What about a USB LTE adapter, and give your unit a USB port?

I'm saying this from the comfort of my armchair, so maybe that's too hard / too stupid.


On 3/8/2016 3:02 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
Pre-certified does not mean permitted on a network.

If you buy the sierra gateway solutions which is an all-in-one box, this is considered a product, and the hoops have been jumped through by sierra wireless.

On the other hand the 'modules' generally are pre-certified, but are not considered a finished product which means you have to go through a 'light' version of PTCRB testing. See the article at http://www.ecnmag.com/article/2012/07/cellular-carrier-certification-requirements , this sums it up pretty well. The thing that has changed for me is the cost of the AT&T certification even with a pre-certified "almost automatic" approval, was really expensive until recently.


On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    If you were to take a module from Sierra Wireless, aren't those
    pretty much all pre-certified?

    On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account)
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I still want everyone else's answer to this... but I'll add my
        $0.02:  (I guess what I'm saying is I don't want to hijack
        this thread....since I'm interested in everyone's answers.)

        I've been looking at adding a product to the PacketFlux line
        which uses a cellular modem to manage it.  The hold up until
        recently has been the arrogance of the cellular companies,
        especially in the US. Getting a cellular modem module and
        integrating it isn't a big issue for us (I've been playing
        with this for a while).   Jumping through the hoops the
        cellular companies require for this IS a big deal, and
        historically has cost a lot of money.   It is amazing how you
        can take a module which the cellular companies have
        pre-approved on their network, but it still costs $20K to
        certify a product which uses the module as it was intended to
        be permitted to talk on their network.  Add a SKU?  Another
        10K, even if it's virtually identical hardware.

        Recently AT&T has softened their policies on this to permit
        pre-certified modules on the network (supposedly) without
        jumping through the expensive hoops.   So, this may be
        happening sooner than I would have expected.   I sort of am
        envisioning some sort of hybrid connection to the sitemonitor
        line, plus ability to control other devices via snmp or telnet.

        On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Eric Kuhnke
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            For example with HSPA+/LTE modems, to have proper OOB into
            the routers at a crucial POP.

            $6/mo per active SIM card is pretty cheap for M2M data
            SIMs, though the $/MB rate is not the best. But for the
            application I have in mind it would be console SSH
            traffic, which is super low bandwidth.

            https://ting.com/rates

            For LTE they're an MVNO on AT&T and T-Mobile.

            Looking at the FAQ they say that the data usage can be
            limited and monitored on a per-device basis, which could
            be useful.






-- *Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
        Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT
        59602
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> |
        http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.packetflux.com/>
        <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
        <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>






--
*Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.packetflux.com/> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>



Reply via email to