Telrad has 900 solution? Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you are in a perfect position to get Cambium and Telrad to give > you some equipment to do a real live shootout in the 900 band. Everyone > wants to know the outcome of this contest. > > *From:* David Young <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 1:54 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] LTE I need a valium > > > We are a tiny municipally owned WISP and still very heavy to old Canopy > 900. Our territory is far more than 90% wooded and very hilly. We have > been gearing up for an LTE trial, but paused to see what we can do with > spacial diversity on our legacy 320 WiMAX, and with a 450i 900 sector > deployment. > > Things I think we have learned are that at our small scale we may not need > carrier class gear; Telrad LTE is now ready and it recently was not; and > you need to right-size your system base stations depending upon how poor > and how many poor connections you allow on your network because the weak > connections put very high demands on a system. > > > > David Young > > Administrative Coordinator > > Town of Warwick > > 978-729-3224 (mobile) > > 978-544-6315 (Selectboard office) > > 413-676-9544 (Broadband service) > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John Woodfield > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 3:02 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* {Spam?} Re: [AFMUG] I need a valium > > > > If you expect LTE 3ghz to be the silver NLOS bullet it is not. > > > > Putting speeds aside for the moment. Lets just talk signal. Same tower, > same height Telrad 3ghz LTE with the Alpha dual-slant sector within 1db > signal as 2.4 NBM2 on a UBNT 10db omni. > > > > LTE does not change physics. The sales guys want you to believe that. It > ain't so. > > > > So, if you can attain a -75 on a 2.4 omni on a tower it won't work worth > anything. That same signal on LTE will rock. > > > > If you think it was have equal penetration to 900mhz and be a replacement > for your old FSK system, you are sorely mistaken. > > > > Near line of site? Yes. > > > > We had a very specific application that Patrick said without question > would work. When it didn't it was a bad antenna, then it was bad jumpers, > then it was a bad compact, finally they flew someone in who argued with it > for a day and at the end of the day? You can't argue with physics. > > > > The whole "watch it work at -110" is garbage too. They skewed the numbers > by 30db. Yes, it will work at -80, will it work well? YMMV. > > > > In the end it was too expensive for the limited benefits we observed. They > swear I'm the only one in the world it didn't work for in the same breath > they swore it would work without any doubt. > > > > > > > > John Woodfield, President > > Delmarva WiFi Inc. > > 410-870-WiFi > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:46pm > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] I need a valium > > Ditto. Hell, onlist would be fine too. I'm sure many of us would like to > hear your experience. > > -Ty > > > > > > -Ty > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:49 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I would like to know your complaints as well, please. Thanks. (offlist > is fine) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Adam Moffett <[email protected]> > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:30 AM > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] I need a valium > > If I may ask John, what were your complaints? > > On 3/16/2016 10:17 AM, John Woodfield wrote: > > I wouldn't touch Telrad again if you paid me. That is a week of my life > I'll never get back. > > > > > > > > > > John Woodfield, President > > Delmarva WiFi Inc. > > 410-870-WiFi > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" mailto:[email protected]%3E > <[email protected]%3E> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:14am > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] I need a valium > > Hate being a decision maker sometimes. > > Love the cambium pmp450 roadmap. I know several people are using pmp450 > in 3.65 and it works. I also see now that a panel antenna is available > based on the 450i in 3.65 > > I may have fallen in love with lte. Haven't seen the telrad talk yet. > Hear the new vendor does lte for roughly what we started our 900 network > for back in 2004. > > Why would I choose lte over cambium ? > > Would I? I think the cambium pmp450 (in 3.65) has a better roadmap....one > gig aps by like 2017..... > > What if I choose the wrong product? > > Convince me..... > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> > To: mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: [AFMUG] 450M > Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 10:02 AM > > > > 450i is backwards compatible with 450 today. > > Jeff Broadwick > > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. > > 312-205-2519 Office > > 574-220-7826 Cell > > [email protected] > > > On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Brian Sullivan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Just like FSK? > > On 3/16/2016 7:40 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > Backwards compatibility. > > With existing 450 > >
