No, but they claim to have very good nlos performance with their 3.65ghz solution.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> wrote: > Telrad has 900 solution? > > Jaime Solorza > Wireless Systems Architect > 915-861-1390 > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think you are in a perfect position to get Cambium and Telrad to give >> you some equipment to do a real live shootout in the 900 band. Everyone >> wants to know the outcome of this contest. >> >> *From:* David Young <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 1:54 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] LTE I need a valium >> >> >> We are a tiny municipally owned WISP and still very heavy to old Canopy >> 900. Our territory is far more than 90% wooded and very hilly. We have >> been gearing up for an LTE trial, but paused to see what we can do with >> spacial diversity on our legacy 320 WiMAX, and with a 450i 900 sector >> deployment. >> >> Things I think we have learned are that at our small scale we may not >> need carrier class gear; Telrad LTE is now ready and it recently was not; >> and you need to right-size your system base stations depending upon how >> poor and how many poor connections you allow on your network because the >> weak connections put very high demands on a system. >> >> >> >> David Young >> >> Administrative Coordinator >> >> Town of Warwick >> >> 978-729-3224 (mobile) >> >> 978-544-6315 (Selectboard office) >> >> 413-676-9544 (Broadband service) >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John Woodfield >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 3:02 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* {Spam?} Re: [AFMUG] I need a valium >> >> >> >> If you expect LTE 3ghz to be the silver NLOS bullet it is not. >> >> >> >> Putting speeds aside for the moment. Lets just talk signal. Same tower, >> same height Telrad 3ghz LTE with the Alpha dual-slant sector within 1db >> signal as 2.4 NBM2 on a UBNT 10db omni. >> >> >> >> LTE does not change physics. The sales guys want you to believe that. It >> ain't so. >> >> >> >> So, if you can attain a -75 on a 2.4 omni on a tower it won't work worth >> anything. That same signal on LTE will rock. >> >> >> >> If you think it was have equal penetration to 900mhz and be a replacement >> for your old FSK system, you are sorely mistaken. >> >> >> >> Near line of site? Yes. >> >> >> >> We had a very specific application that Patrick said without question >> would work. When it didn't it was a bad antenna, then it was bad jumpers, >> then it was a bad compact, finally they flew someone in who argued with it >> for a day and at the end of the day? You can't argue with physics. >> >> >> >> The whole "watch it work at -110" is garbage too. They skewed the numbers >> by 30db. Yes, it will work at -80, will it work well? YMMV. >> >> >> >> In the end it was too expensive for the limited benefits we observed. >> They swear I'm the only one in the world it didn't work for in the same >> breath they swore it would work without any doubt. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> John Woodfield, President >> >> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >> >> 410-870-WiFi >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:46pm >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] I need a valium >> >> Ditto. Hell, onlist would be fine too. I'm sure many of us would like to >> hear your experience. >> >> -Ty >> >> >> >> >> >> -Ty >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:49 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> I would like to know your complaints as well, please. Thanks. (offlist >> is fine) >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> *From:* Adam Moffett <[email protected]> >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:30 AM >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] I need a valium >> >> If I may ask John, what were your complaints? >> >> On 3/16/2016 10:17 AM, John Woodfield wrote: >> >> I wouldn't touch Telrad again if you paid me. That is a week of my life >> I'll never get back. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> John Woodfield, President >> >> Delmarva WiFi Inc. >> >> 410-870-WiFi >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" mailto:[email protected]%3E >> <[email protected]%3E> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:14am >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [AFMUG] I need a valium >> >> Hate being a decision maker sometimes. >> >> Love the cambium pmp450 roadmap. I know several people are using pmp450 >> in 3.65 and it works. I also see now that a panel antenna is available >> based on the 450i in 3.65 >> >> I may have fallen in love with lte. Haven't seen the telrad talk yet. >> Hear the new vendor does lte for roughly what we started our 900 network >> for back in 2004. >> >> Why would I choose lte over cambium ? >> >> Would I? I think the cambium pmp450 (in 3.65) has a better >> roadmap....one gig aps by like 2017..... >> >> What if I choose the wrong product? >> >> Convince me..... >> >> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone >> >> >> >> ----- Reply message ----- >> From: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> >> To: mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> >> Subject: [AFMUG] 450M >> Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 10:02 AM >> >> >> >> 450i is backwards compatible with 450 today. >> >> Jeff Broadwick >> >> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >> >> 312-205-2519 Office >> >> 574-220-7826 Cell >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Brian Sullivan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Just like FSK? >> >> On 3/16/2016 7:40 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: >> >> Backwards compatibility. >> >> With existing 450 >> >> >
