Yes no unsure, I believe by summer On Mar 17, 2016 12:16 PM, "Josh Baird" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I missed the UBNT session.. Is the form-factor of this radio the same as > the other AirFiberX radios? Does it have a SFP interface? When will they > be available? > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> There was discussion about waveguide - I pushed for it. I mentioned >> the RF Elements adapters as well... >> >> In the end, it was decided that N connectors were more universal and >> adaptable to various antennas. >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Yup, I believe the B11 is ac based. The AF will do true FDD so you can >> > license standard coordinated channel pairs. And to top it off, they >> went the >> > Exalt path with field replaceable diplexers. And looks like you can >> reverse >> > the diplexer for high or low side. >> > >> > The N connector thing is kinda odd. As Chuck said, they would've been >> better >> > off with SMA @ 11GHz. Or even better, a f'n waveguide interface! C'mon >> UBNT! >> > >> > On 3/17/2016 10:40 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >> > >> > I'm pretty sure Mimosa actually is 802.11 based, but yeah the airFiber >> > certainly is not. >> > >> > Also, do NOT compare airFiber quality with anything else UBNT makes... >> it's >> > on a completely different level than the airMax stuff. >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Mimosa isn't 802.11 based as far as I know. UBNT is doing this on >> >> AirFiber FPGA. Who's making 802.11 based 11G radios? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:32 AM, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > is anyone else concerned about the quality and reliability that comes >> >> > with >> >> > these low cost 802.11 based 11ghz radios?? >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> When we bought our SAF stuff a few years back, we had to show our >> >> >> distributor our coordination docs before they would ship gear. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Lewis Bergman >> >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > I don't know about turning sellers into enforcement arms of the >> FCC. >> >> >> > All >> >> >> > of >> >> >> > that is really the FCC's job. Has there really been a problem? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 10:17 AM Cassidy B. Larson < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> That would be an awesome idea to limit random joes from lighting >> up >> >> >> >> un-registered/coordinated links. But shouldnt they do that for >> 3.65 >> >> >> >> as >> >> >> >> well? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mar 17, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Brian Sullivan >> >> >> >> > <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Can't they force some sort of compliance with license keys you >> get >> >> >> >> > after >> >> >> >> > you prove your FCC application/coordination? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
