No. TFTP flash recreates the flash filesystem. HTTP upgrade does not. On Apr 10, 2016 9:38 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> wrote:
> if it happens to be crumped, and i http it a firmware, it should still > overwrite the funtime hatred shouldnt it? > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Nope. Just TFTP flash it to the newest stable firmware. >> On Apr 10, 2016 9:02 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is there somethin ng to run against this air router to check it? >>> On Apr 10, 2016 7:53 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/07/29/antivirus_blood_splattered_as_biz_warned_audit_or_die/ >>>> >>>> >>>> http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/09/security-wares-like-kaspersky-av-can-make-you-more-vulnerable-to-attacks/ >>>> >>>> >>>> https://books.google.com/books?id=wqV1CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA183&lpg=PA183&dq=antivirus+attack+surface&source=bl&ots=HF7hnyj7sN&sig=Ski6OAQaLdD4MeIDGJRfuNoaZiE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjsgP7nroXMAhUjk4MKHb19DQ0Q6AEIKzAE#v=onepage&q=antivirus%20attack%20surface&f=false >>>> On Apr 10, 2016 6:21 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Josh, >>>>> >>>>> Can you expand that? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The following is the last communication, note this started as a >>>>> slowness complaint. >>>>> >>>>> Hi. I had a couple questions regarding the wireless router that you >>>>> provide with my service. Since I don't have access to the device, could >>>>> you >>>>> turn off broadcasting of the SSID please? The reason for this request due >>>>> to a very damaging virus/malware that hit my home network extremely >>>>> hard.gained access to my networks through the wireless connection and my >>>>> phone, which then took out every thing else connected. The Wi-Fi that >>>>> caused the issue ended up as "OPEN" and not longer secure. Since there is >>>>> such massive distances between any of us our her I would only see that >>>>> specific SSID on days when everthing allowed to to travel just a litter >>>>> bit >>>>> further. And when I did see it over the last 1.5 years, but it was always >>>>> "Secured". Anyway... the story is much longer but A. can you hide the SSID >>>>> and possibly change it to something else? This way I know it has a little >>>>> extra protection. But please let me know the the SSID. Do you by chance >>>>> know of an SSID near me of: ISPSTUFF360? It's Mac address is >>>>> 00:60:ld:f1:91:be. It came back as a Lucent Technologies device. Also.. I >>>>> was not simply taken out of service by 1 "Open" device...I was taken out >>>>> by >>>>> 2 ! The second one that is also broadcasting as "Open is similar in name. >>>>> . >>>>> It\s SSID is ISPSTUFF1000. I have it's mac address somewhere in the middle >>>>> of all this mess, but its the same I believe. It also resolved by MAC >>>>> address to a Lucent Technologies Devic. From what discovered from once I >>>>> had a change to finish up replacing the hard drive in my laptop, ending up >>>>> with corruption in the bios as well, replacing a drive in my Workstations >>>>> as it would not ever respond to restoration software. And so much figging >>>>> time to install everything. I had to be safe and reset my phone, my tablet >>>>> pc and and my FLAC file of over 119gb of my entire music collection. Not >>>>> to. I still dont feel comfortable given how destructive it was. I >>>>> immediately had to spend our upon hour callng banks, and Website, and >>>>> anyting that I accessed online to change my logins and passwords.. It even >>>>> appears to have left it's mark on the Direct TV DVR as well. So I have >>>>> already spent more $ than I had to spare but I most definately dont trust >>>>> any of the devices anylonger. Especially since the 2 devices are still >>>>> broadcasting as I send this. Kevin >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FYI antimalware/antivirus and adblock are the newest attack vectors. >>>>>> :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Pretty easy way to get persistent malware on machines now. >>>>>> On Apr 10, 2016 3:57 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Im a worst case scenario artist. My concern is the customer will >>>>>>> talk to our customer service, theyll tell him we will replace his >>>>>>> router. >>>>>>> He will bring it in, get a replacement. Its been "infected" and will hit >>>>>>> our Achilles heel. Customer service will drop it in the returns bin. It >>>>>>> will get taken abk and connected to the machine thats used to dump the >>>>>>> file, it will "infect" that machine, that machine will infect the >>>>>>> Customer >>>>>>> service network. A tech will pick up the router and install it at >>>>>>> another >>>>>>> POP. infecting that POP. he will also bring his laptop back and connect >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> to my network. My machine has no real antimalware and he will infect it >>>>>>> across that network. My machine has all the keys to the castle. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the reality is they guy probably had slow wifi in his detached >>>>>>> garage 1500 feet from his house, and his buddy mike said he must be >>>>>>> infected with some really nasty virus because his portable version of >>>>>>> AVG >>>>>>> from 2010 cant find it so it must be direct from anonymous. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cross platform malware is a Thing now, and has been for several >>>>>>>> years. It's fortunately not very prevalent yet. >>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 2016 3:36 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don't believe it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have a friend that comes to some outrageous conclusions with >>>>>>>>> scant information, and practically zero technical knowledge. Yet when >>>>>>>>> he >>>>>>>>> explains something, he sounds perfectly reasonable with impeccable >>>>>>>>> logic. >>>>>>>>> It just never is. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 4/10/2016 1:29 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So we have this customer who experienced a ferocious malware, >>>>>>>>> still waiting on more details from the customer, its very interesting >>>>>>>>> because it crossed multiple platforms. multiple cell phones, a >>>>>>>>> satellite >>>>>>>>> DVR, a PC etc. Im not sure how he verified infection, but he did have >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> factory his phones, his PC he said required a hard drive replacement >>>>>>>>> (not >>>>>>>>> sure what or who decided this) not sure how the satellite DVR was >>>>>>>>> mitigated. He thinks it came from a Rise Broadband (formerly Prairie >>>>>>>>> Inet >>>>>>>>> ESSID (I doubt this, the ESSIDs prairie inet ran were open, with >>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>> security for the access) >>>>>>>>> With it being as cross platform as it was im wondering how i would >>>>>>>>> check the air router we provide to see if it got hit as well. All we >>>>>>>>> do is >>>>>>>>> a dump file on the current firmware that sets a password, ensures 443 >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> open, sets a DMZ to an IP out of the DHCP scope, and we manually set >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> ESSID with WPA2, the key being the MAC on the label ( it think this >>>>>>>>> is the >>>>>>>>> WLAN) (we disable snmp, telnet, but leave ssh open), we also turn off >>>>>>>>> CDP >>>>>>>>> and the ubnt discovery >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Im hoping he has some good info on what this actually was, and its >>>>>>>>> not just a case of his buddy jim telling him all this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anybody know of something in the wild capable of hitting all these >>>>>>>>> devices across a network (wired/wireless) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Im asking about the airrrouter in particular, considering if it >>>>>>>>> were impacted, that could be a mess at the POP since most customer >>>>>>>>> NAT are >>>>>>>>> in the same subnet, with duplicate configs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
