Sure, but with a 10 MHz 256QAM dual polarity channel in 2.4 he's not going to get anywhere near 200 aggregate. It can work great and have good latency, 0% packet loss but it won't be particularly fast.
I would try it, at that distance, if you don't need the AF2 somewhere else in your network you could always resell them to somebody else at a very slight loss if it doesn't work. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> wrote: > Hold on..you'd be surprised what 5 and ,,,10mhz channels at 2.4 can > penetrate...can you test Rory with some masts or bucket truck? I am make a > rig for my truck to mount a 30 ft tower and have a mast to go maybe 15 ft > higher... Some projects are requiring path validations on federal > property.... So bucket truck at one end and my rig at other... > On Apr 22, 2016 6:39 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Like 0? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Apr 22, 2016 8:33 PM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What are the chances of an AF2 with parabolic dishes going through .9 >>> miles of trees with at least 200Mbs assuming no interference? >>> >>> >>> >>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO* >>> >>> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040* >>> >>> *602-426-0542 <602-426-0542>* >>> >>> *[email protected] <[email protected]>* >>> >>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>* >>> >>> >>> >>> “I wish I could play little league now. I’d be way better than before.” >>> >>> >>> >>
