only you can prevent a forrest fire.... or maybe you just choose not to
prevent a forrest fire, the operative word is can, nobody says you have to
prevent it. things like that happen all the time.

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

> Cut some trees.  I have done the more than once.  I was surprised at one
> site where the USFS was totally OK with me cutting whatever trees I wanted
> to cut.  I thought they would be  the opposite.
>
> *From:* Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2016 9:15 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration
>
>
> Yea, I need the capacity though.  100Mbps isn’t going to cut it although
> it may be my only option to start.  Field test time.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2016 8:02 AM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration
>
>
>
> That would be much more solid in the tree situation.
>
>
>
> *From:* Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 22, 2016 11:14 PM
>
> *To:* af <[email protected]>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration
>
>
>
> It's limited to a 20mhz channel, so I think like 120Mbps aggregate... or
> something like that.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What is the new 900 MHz Cambium supposed to do flat out?
>
>
>
> *From:* Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 22, 2016 8:29 PM
>
> *To:* af <[email protected]>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration
>
>
>
> Indeed, a bit odd... I've never known 5ghz to work better than 2.4ghz nlos
> :P
>
> I would just try it and see what it does... even if you just test it with
> a pair of PowerBeams (or better yet, Rockets with 2`dishes), you should be
> able to get a pretty good idea what the airfibers are going to do.
>
> On Apr 22, 2016 8:41 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Something that takes a larger channel width to make the same throughput
> (losing sensitivity due to thermal noise in the process) vs an FPGA radio
> at half the frequency through trees? :P
>
> Just seems like an odd tip.
>
> On Apr 22, 2016 8:35 PM, "Keefe John" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What about a b5?
>
> On April 22, 2016 8:32:36 PM CDT, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> We would need at least 150Mbps to start but as much as I could get is what
> I need.  I don’t have a bucket truck but I can do a reasonable test up
> there to get an idea with both 2.4 and 5GHz.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Friday, April 22, 2016 5:53 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration
>
>
>
> 200 megs in 10 MHz?  AF2x?????
>
> Josh Luthman
>
>
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Apr 22, 2016 8:48 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hold on..you'd be surprised what 5 and ,,,10mhz channels at 2.4 can
> penetrate...can you test Rory with some masts or bucket truck?  I am make a
> rig for my truck to mount a 30 ft tower and have a mast to go maybe  15 ft
> higher... Some projects are requiring path validations on federal
> property.... So bucket truck at one end and my rig at other...
>
> On Apr 22, 2016 6:39 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Like 0?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Apr 22, 2016 8:33 PM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What are the chances of an AF2 with parabolic dishes going through .9
> miles of trees with at least 200Mbs assuming no interference?
>
>
>
> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO*
>
> *4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040*
>
> *602-426-0542 <602-426-0542>*
>
> *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
>
> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
>
>
>
> “I wish I could play little league now.  I’d be way better than before.”
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
>
>



-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to