I think he means the 450i integrated 90 degree sector AP. Matt said that's not the best choice for frequency reuse due to the relatively low F/B ratio on that antenna. That's what the connectorized AP is for... clusters.

I don't think there's anything wrong with the KP antennas. We've use quite a few of them. However, we've found that the Cambium/Laird/Anatel/whatever the hell they are now OEM sectors with null-fill work the best. That's just my opinion. Do we like paying out the ass for an antenna... no, but it works for us.

On 5/2/2016 10:43 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I have a hard time believing the OEM sector doesn't have a sufficient FTB.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I didn't think the integrated sector option had the front to back
    required for abab?

    On May 2, 2016 9:59 PM, "Kurt Fankhauser"
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Is that the new 450i AP? Why did you use KP sectors instead of
        the integrated sector option? Also why not be on thst grainleg
        in the background too? Also how tall is that tower?

        Sent from my iPhone

        Kurt Fankhauser
        Wavelinc Communications
        P.O. Box 126
        Bucyrus, OH 44820
        http://www.wavelinc.com
        tel. 419-562-6405 <tel:419-562-6405>
        fax. 419-617-0110 <tel:419-617-0110>

        On May 2, 2016, at 5:19 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        When the 5GHz 450 first came out, we quickly used it to
        replace the last of the Trango 5830's we had left (12 or 13
        sectors). The 5830 stuff wasn't as robust as Canopy FSK, but
        it sure worked for a long time just like FSK.

        On 5/2/2016 3:31 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
        Funny seeing those two next to each other.  It's like a
        rotary phone next to the latest iPhone.


        Josh Luthman
        Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
        Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
        1100 Wayne St
        Suite 1337
        Troy, OH 45373

        On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Ben Royer
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Yep, old network was inherited Trango from another
            company, hence the upgrade to 450i to migrate clients to
            the latest and greatest.
            Thank you,
            Ben Royer, Operations Manager
            Royell Communications, Inc.
            217-965-3699 <tel:217-965-3699> www.royell.net
            <http://www.royell.net>
            *From:* Josh Luthman <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Sent:* Monday, May 02, 2016 2:56 PM
            *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 Install - Drone
            Trango next to four 450i LOL!!!
            Josh Luthman
            Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
            Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
            1100 Wayne St
            Suite 1337
            Troy, OH 45373
            On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Jerry Head
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                Nice video.
                I'll bet your climbers talk really nice about you
                when they are climbing around that sector.....



                On 5/2/2016 1:52 PM, Ben Royer wrote:
                Just thought I’d share this here too, it’s at the
                Cambium Community also.  I took my drone out to a
                jobsite where we just installed some 450 on a tower
                we acquired. It was a little windy, so the video
                has a few bumps in it. Enjoy.
                http://www.royell.org/cambium/450i5G.mp4
                Thank you,
                Ben Royer, Operations Manager
                Royell Communications, Inc.
                217-965-3699 <tel:217-965-3699> www.royell.net
                <http://www.royell.net>





Reply via email to