I want to say earlier than that but I don't have anything older either.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:49 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that was added in 6.25 or so? The oldest I have on the network is > 6.27 and it's there. > > > On 5/12/2016 9:29 AM, Jerry Head wrote: > > The Torch on my CCR does not look like that, no DSCP option at all..... > > On 5/11/2016 11:54 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > > Make sure you are using the right settings in Torch.... > > and you can always sort on the DSCP Marks. > > You should see something like in the attached picture... > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: <[email protected]> > [email protected] > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Andreas Wiatowski" <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:46:07 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS > > I’ve been trying to see DSCP marks in torch on our CRR’s… can’t seem to > see anything in the interface. I’m going to try a packet capture and view > in Wireshark. > > > > Thanks for your input. > > > > Cheers, > > ______________________________ > > Andreas Wiatowski | CEO > > Silo Wireless Inc. > > Email <[email protected]>[email protected] > > 19 Sage Court > > Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA) > > Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free > +1.866.727.4138 > > > > *From:* Af [ <[email protected]>mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Faisal Imtiaz > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:48 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS > > > > Andreas, > > > > Yes, here is the logic.... > > > > PBX should mark packets correctly (RTP packets as well as SIP > signaling... for packets going towards to the CPE). > > Phone CPE should mark packets correctly... (for packets going to the PBX) > > > > Routers typically are not constrained on their pipes, so traffic flows > well. > > Unless you are using some sort of queues to restrict traffic flow.... then > you have to make sure that dscp/qos marked traffic flows with priority. > > > > Most radio's will respect DSCP/QoS marks and allocate priority > accordingly... (check with your radio mfg / firmware version, config etc). > > > > BTW you can easily see the DSCP/QoS marks if you use TORCH on the MT, it > is real time.... :) > > > > Regards > > > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: <[email protected]> > [email protected] > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Andreas Wiatowski" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:17:03 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS > > Faisal, > > > > So the packets should still contain DSCP tags regardless of layer2 or > layer3? > > > > Sounds like I will need to do some packet captures. > > > > Cheers, > > ______________________________ > > Andreas Wiatowski | CEO > > Silo Wireless Inc. > > Email <[email protected]>[email protected] > > 19 Sage Court > > Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA) > > Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free > +1.866.727.4138 > > > > *From:* Af [ <[email protected]>mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Faisal Imtiaz > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 11, 2016 9:35 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS > > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > in our network, we handle this as follows:- > > > > 1) we make sure that the PBX is marking the packets with the DSCP tags > correctly. > > 2) we make sure that the phone/iad are marking the packets with DSCP tags > correctly. > > 3) we make sure that the Radios (AP & CPE) are using firmware that > respects the DSCP Tags, and provides them with appropriate priority > > 4) we don't do anything on our routers (in our network). if we have to, > the only thing we do on the customer router (Dmarc) is to make sure that > the dscp tags are correct. > > > > And this works very well for us. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Andreas Wiatowski" < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:39:36 AM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS > > Hello All! > > > > We have about 90 sites primarily with CCR’s of various flavours. We have > yet to implement any type of QOS for our VOIP..but we are starting to feel > some quality pain with a couple of our “ON NET” PBX/SIP products. > > > > I have been reading about using mangle rules to mark connections and then > packets, then setting up a QUEUE tree in MT where the packet marks are > prioritized. We are fully routed with no layer 2 / bridging. I’m > wondering if I can accomplish the same thing by just identifying the IP of > my Multi-Tenant PBX box and any traffic moving to and from…and prioritizing > it as 1. Secondly, do I have to do this on every single router on my > network? > > > > OR Is it a better practice to IDENTIFY DCSP or TOS, mark and prioritize > that instead. Just looking for the best way to unify this across my > network. > > > > Anyone have examples? Many of the examples I have seen really relate to > SOHO type situations…. We are talking much larger here. Most of my > transport is 200Mbps to 10Gbps between sites. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Andreas Wiatowski, CEO > > Silo Wireless Inc. > > 519-449-5656 x-600 > > > > > > > > > > >
