I would recommend 11GHz for ptp...I would test the Cambium and Ubiquiti 900 since antennas are in place...but I am thinking of LTE MuMimo solutions as well.. with all the tanks they have I would reduce long links to closest one...right now most shoot to one tank....the original 1993 design is obsolete On Jun 9, 2016 8:07 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe 4.9 GHz LOS links between towers, and Cambium PMP450i and PTP450i in > 900 MHz for the NLOS links? > > As long as they stick with cameras that have reasonable BW requirements. > > > *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:52 AM > *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] If it was you... > > > 4.9 is not a good option due to existing public safety links on both sides > of border. The new PLCs from Allen Bradley are IP based as well other > gear they are now using. Also heard they are considering cameras at Wells > not just boosters and wastewater. > On Jun 9, 2016 7:43 AM, "Cameron Crum" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If they have to have the data throughput then I'd tell them to go with >> 4.9 and leave the unlicensed guys alone. But, do they really need it? Is >> this like using a backhoe to dig a fence post hole? >> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Make sure the big ‘ol wall people want ends up blocking the RF? lol >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> While working at Storm Water site today, one of the water Co. SCADA guys >>> came by... he discussed that they are looking at WiMax and also 4.9GHz to >>> replace existing licensed 900mhz network for our 600 locations. They are >>> using MDS SD9 radios for MAS and LEDR for ptp.... they want to move up to >>> faster Ethernet based radios.... I listened and offered no comments....I >>> was not about to tell them about WiMAX or that our sister city has over 200 >>> 4.9GHz links in operation since 2010...I have ideas of what I would >>> do...Some background.... .many remote links are NLOS...easy to do with >>> their existing 5 Watt licensed radios and APs on 150 Ft elevated tanks or >>> mountain. ptp links are easy for most of east and lower valley because of >>> tanks available and mountain locations....let's see what you gurus >>> suggest....we are on border and it is very noisy in all bands. I mean all >>> bands >>> >>> >>> >> >
