AF3X? On Jun 9, 2016 12:10 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The existing antennas though are single pol, if they are wanting to go > broadband with new radios, I would think dual pol. > > I would not recommend any frequency converted (900 and 3650 MHz) Ubiquiti > radios, they seem to have a variety of problems, also unlikely to have any > development thrown at them going forward. > > In any case, their existing 900 MHz SCADA stuff will likely interfere > heavily with any new 900 MHz radios they try to put at the same site, so a > graceful upgrade may be impossible anyway. > > > *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2016 9:32 AM > *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] If it was you... > > > I would recommend 11GHz for ptp...I would test the Cambium and Ubiquiti > 900 since antennas are in place...but I am thinking of LTE MuMimo solutions > as well.. with all the tanks they have I would reduce long links to > closest one...right now most shoot to one tank....the original 1993 design > is obsolete > On Jun 9, 2016 8:07 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Maybe 4.9 GHz LOS links between towers, and Cambium PMP450i and PTP450i >> in 900 MHz for the NLOS links? >> >> As long as they stick with cameras that have reasonable BW requirements. >> >> >> *From:* Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:52 AM >> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] If it was you... >> >> >> 4.9 is not a good option due to existing public safety links on both >> sides of border. The new PLCs from Allen Bradley are IP based as well >> other gear they are now using. Also heard they are considering cameras at >> Wells not just boosters and wastewater. >> On Jun 9, 2016 7:43 AM, "Cameron Crum" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If they have to have the data throughput then I'd tell them to go with >>> 4.9 and leave the unlicensed guys alone. But, do they really need it? Is >>> this like using a backhoe to dig a fence post hole? >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Make sure the big ‘ol wall people want ends up blocking the RF? lol >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> While working at Storm Water site today, one of the water Co. SCADA >>>> guys came by... he discussed that they are looking at WiMax and also 4.9GHz >>>> to replace existing licensed 900mhz network for our 600 locations. They >>>> are using MDS SD9 radios for MAS and LEDR for ptp.... they want to move up >>>> to faster Ethernet based radios.... I listened and offered no comments....I >>>> was not about to tell them about WiMAX or that our sister city has over 200 >>>> 4.9GHz links in operation since 2010...I have ideas of what I would >>>> do...Some background.... .many remote links are NLOS...easy to do with >>>> their existing 5 Watt licensed radios and APs on 150 Ft elevated tanks or >>>> mountain. ptp links are easy for most of east and lower valley because of >>>> tanks available and mountain locations....let's see what you gurus >>>> suggest....we are on border and it is very noisy in all bands. I mean all >>>> bands >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
